High Court Allows Writ Appeal for Interest on Terminal Benefits Due to Financial Crisis. Court Recognizes Delayed Payment Circumstances and Directs 4% Interest Payment on Terminal Benefits.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The intra Court appeal was filed by the appellant seeking interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits. The appellant retired on 31.08.2019, and his terminal benefits were settled on 22.01.2021. The writ court had previously ruled that the appellant was not entitled to any interest for the delayed payment. The appellant's counsel argued that he deserved interest due to the significant delay in payment. The respondents contended that the delay was due to a financial crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, which hindered the immediate settlement of terminal benefits. The court considered the financial difficulties faced by the Transport Corporation and decided to set aside the previous order denying interest. It directed the respondents to pay 4% interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits within eight weeks. The writ appeal was allowed in part, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Terminal Benefits - Entitlement to Interest - Not applicable under the circumstances - The appellant sought interest on delayed terminal benefits settled post-retirement. The court acknowledged the financial crisis faced by the Transport Corporation during the Covid-19 period and directed payment of 4% interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits within eight weeks. Held that the appellant is entitled to interest due to the circumstances of delayed payment (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the writ order denying interest and directed the respondents to pay 4% interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed payment
  • Terminal benefits
  • Financial crisis considerations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (08) 166

WA No. 184 of 2023

2026-08-17

S. M. Subramaniam, Krishnaswamy Govindarajan

2026:MHC:3403

Mr.K.M. Ramesh, Mr.S. Sakthivel, Mr.M. Aswin, Ms.S.Pavithra, Mr.C.S.K.Sathish

D.Sampathkumar

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (villupuram) Ltd., The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Intra Court appeal regarding interest on terminal benefits.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought interest on belated settlement of terminal benefits.

Filing Reason

The writ court denied interest on terminal benefits.

Previous Decisions

Writ court ruled that the appellant was not entitled to interest.

Issues

Entitlement to interest on delayed terminal benefits

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for interest due to delay in payment. Respondents cited financial crisis due to Covid-19 as reason for delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court recognized the financial crisis faced by the Transport Corporation during the Covid-19 pandemic as a valid reason for the delay in payment, but still held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the belated settlement of terminal benefits.

Judgment Excerpts

The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking interest on belated settlement of terminal benefits due to him. The terminal benefits due to him had been settled on 22.01.2021. The Court have taken a view to pay 4% interest considering the financial crisis existed during the relevant point of time. Accordingly, the impugned writ order dated 15.09.2022 is set aside to the extent denying the interest to the appellant.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition which was decided on 15.09.2022, leading to the present intra Court appeal.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Customs Export Duty Demand in Tariff Act and Customs Act Dispute. Court Held That Under Section 16 of Customs Act, 1962, Rate of Export Duty is Determined by Date of Presentation of Shipping Bill or Date of Entry O...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Holds Central Government's Decision Under Section 111 Companies Act 1956 Is Subject to Appeal Under Article 136 and Must Be Reasoned. Absence of Reasons in Share Transfer Registration Appeal Vitiates Order and Warrants Remand to Central...