High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Petition Regarding Inheritance Rights of Deceased Coparcener's Daughter. The court ruled that the remarriage of the widow does not affect the inheritance rights of the deceased coparcener's daughter under Section 24 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging a docket order related to the execution of a decree concerning the estate of a deceased coparcener, Venkatesan. The petitioner, the 4th defendant, contended that upon the remarriage of Venkatesan's widow, the share of the deceased coparcener should revert to the other coparceners, thereby enlarging their shares, despite the existence of Venkatesan's daughter. The widow had remarried, which according to the petitioner, disqualified her from claiming any share in Venkatesan's estate. The respondent's counsel argued that the execution petition was not maintainable as the daughter had already inherited the estate and alienated the property. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, particularly Section 24, which disqualifies a widow from inheriting if she remarries. However, the court clarified that this disqualification does not extend to other legal heirs, such as the daughter, who retains her right to inherit. The court distinguished the current case from precedents involving Section 25, which pertains to disqualification due to criminal acts. Ultimately, the court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the daughter's entitlement to her father's estate and rejecting the petitioner's claims regarding the reversion of shares. The court found no merit in the arguments presented by the petitioner and upheld the decision of the Subordinate Court.

Headnote

A) Hindu Succession Act - Inheritance Rights - Remarriage of Widow - Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 24 - The court held that the widow's remarriage does not affect the inheritance rights of the deceased coparcener's daughter, who is entitled to inherit the entire share. The court found that the widow's rights are forfeited, but the coparcener's interest remains available to other Class I legal heirs, including the daughter (Paras 3-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the share of the deceased coparcener would revert to other coparceners upon the remarriage of his widow or if the daughter would inherit the entire share.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, affirming the daughter's right to inherit her father's estate and rejecting the petitioner's claims regarding the reversion of shares.

Law Points

  • Hindu Succession Act
  • 1956
  • Section 24
  • coparcenary rights
  • inheritance
  • remarriage of widow
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (08) 118

CRP No.3576 of 2023

2026-08-25

P.B. Balaji

Mr.S.Natarajan, Mr.N.Istiaq Ahmed

K.Duraisamy

Dhanalakshmi and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Petition challenging a docket order regarding inheritance rights.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the docket order regarding the execution of a decree.

Filing Reason

Dispute over the inheritance rights of the deceased coparcener's daughter following the remarriage of his widow.

Previous Decisions

The Subordinate Court had previously ruled on the inheritance rights, which the petitioner sought to challenge.

Issues

Whether the share of the deceased coparcener would revert to other coparceners upon the remarriage of his widow. Whether the daughter of the deceased coparcener would inherit the entire share.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the widow's remarriage disqualified her from inheriting, thus reverting the share to other coparceners. Respondent contended that the daughter inherited the estate and the execution petition was not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the remarriage of the widow does not affect the inheritance rights of the deceased coparcener's daughter, who is entitled to inherit the entire share under Section 24 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Judgment Excerpts

The short, but interesting point that arises for consideration in the present revision is as to whether the share of the deceased coparcener/son would go back to the other coparceners, when his wife had chosen to remarry after his demise or whether the daughter of the deceased coparcener son would inherit the entire share of the said deceased coparcener. The widow of Venkatesan, remarried and she never chose to stake any claim in the estate of Venkatesan. The present case being the only Class I legal heirs, the 5th respondent, daughter of Venkatesan has inherited his entire coparcenary interest on his demise.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition against the docket order dated 26.02.2018 in E.P. No. 618 of 2017 in O.S. No. 91 of 1993.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Landowners in Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal — High Court Erred in Reducing Compensation Below Collector's Offer for Kuhal and Katuhal Lands. The Supreme Court held that under Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by TWAD Board — Holds That Cancellation Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and That Tender Conditions Must Be Strictly Const...