High Court of Judicature at Madras Allows Writ Petition for Unblocking Input Tax Credit Ledger — Court directs expeditious consideration of unblocking request.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a notice dated 16.06.2026 blocking the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the petitioner, Tvl Mettca Impex LLP, due to alleged supplies received from Vetrivel Traders. The petitioner, represented by its CEO, contended that the blocking deprived them of their statutory right to utilize the amounts in the electronic credit ledger for making a pre-deposit under Section 107 of the GST enactments. The petitioner argued that they had submitted all necessary documents to establish eligibility for ITC under Section 16 and that Rule 86A should not be used to deny their statutory rights. The respondent, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, justified the blocking by stating that Vetrivel Traders was found to be a bill trader with no physical stock at their premises. The court noted that while Rule 86A allows for blocking of credit under certain conditions, it also provides a mechanism for unblocking upon request. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's request for unblocking the credit ledger expeditiously, emphasizing that if the request is rejected, a speaking order must be issued within one month. The court did not impose any costs.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Input Tax Credit - Blocking of Credit - Rule 86A of TNGST Rules, 2017 - The petitioner challenged the blocking of input tax credit based on alleged supplies from a trader found non-existent. The court held that the blocking of credit under Rule 86A is permissible if reasons are recorded, but the petitioner must be allowed to request unblocking, which should be considered expeditiously (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the blocking of the input tax credit ledger under Rule 86A was justified and whether the petitioner had the right to utilize the amounts in the electronic credit ledger for pre-deposit under Section 107.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's request for unblocking the electronic credit ledger expeditiously and to issue a speaking order if the request is rejected within one month.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • Input Tax Credit
  • GST
  • Rule 86A
  • Section 107
  • Section 49
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (08) 86

WP No. 28507 of 2026

2026-08-28

Mr. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

2026:MHC:3605

Mr. Rupesh Sharma, Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

Tvl Mettca Impex LLP

Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the blocking of input tax credit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the blocking notice and unblock the input tax credit ledger.

Filing Reason

Blocking of ITC due to alleged supplies from a trader found non-existent.

Issues

Validity of blocking input tax credit under Rule 86A Right to utilize electronic credit ledger for pre-deposit under Section 107

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that blocking deprived them of statutory rights and that Rule 86A should not deny their rights. Respondent contended that blocking was justified due to findings against Vetrivel Traders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while Rule 86A allows for blocking of credit under certain conditions, it also provides a mechanism for unblocking upon request, which must be considered expeditiously.

Judgment Excerpts

The principal ground of challenge by the petitioner is that such blocking deprives the petitioner of the statutory right to use amounts lying in the electronic credit ledger for making the pre-deposit under Section 107. Considering the fact that the application for unblocking has been made, it is just and necessary that such application be dealt with expeditiously.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the blocking of ITC and seeking unblocking of the electronic credit ledger.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 16, Section 49, Section 74A, Section 107
  • Goods and Services Tax Act: Section 49
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Swimming Pool Drowning Case — Acquittal Upheld for Lack of Proof of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires direct causal link between a positive act of rashness or negligence and death; mere omi...
Related Judgement
High Court FIRST APPEAL NO.316 OF 2015