Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Orders in Service and Property Matters. Appeals Challenge Orders Dated 10-07-2023 and 17-07-2023 in Various Writ Petitions Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-06 20:03:57
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010076242024_2

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (07) 92

WA NO. 200/2024 c/w WA NO.863/2023, WA NO.941/2023, WA NO.942/2023, WA NO.1038/2023, WA NO.1369/2023, WA NO.212/2024

2026-07-22

Justice Anu Sivaraman, Justice Venkatesh Naik T

Reuben Jacob, Vikas Rojipura, M.S.Bhagwath, Satish K., Vijay Kumar, P.S.Rajagopal, Prashanth L. Kanal, Vigneshwar S. Shastri, Gururaj, Dhyan Chinnappa, Sundara Raman M.V., Anoop Haranahalli, V.C. Bhadragouda, Nagapraveena D.A.

The State of Karnataka & others

Rangaramu M.R. & others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Remedy Sought

The appellants in the writ appeals sought to set aside orders passed by the learned Single Judge in various writ petitions, as detailed in the prayers.

Procedural History

The writ appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, against orders of the learned Single Judge in various writ petitions.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ appeal Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Section 4

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government... 2026-08-06 20:03:57
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Insurers Upheld. Claimant allowed to amend petition from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and compensation enhanced f... 2026-08-06 20:03:57
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5184 OF 2026

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against School Tribunal's Denial of Reinstatement t...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining Performanc...

Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, Leaving Le...

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Decision in Plant Variety Registration Dispute Concer...

(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.2247 of 2024)

Supreme Court Examines Employee's Right to Withdraw Resignation and Effect of Ratification...

Lost Your Password?