Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition for Survey and Land Register Extract — Direction to Furnish Document on Readiness Expressed by Government Pleader. Mandamus under Article 226 Allowed as Respondent Had No Objection to Furnishing SLR Extract.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Boominathan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector of Ramanathapuram District to furnish the extract of the Survey and Land Register pertaining to Survey No. 278, Samasthanam, in Kadalur Village, Uppur Group, R.S. Mangalam Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. The petitioner had made an application for the document on 10.01.2025 but did not receive it, prompting the filing of the writ petition. During the hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent submitted that the respondent had no difficulty in furnishing the extract, and on instructions from the officer present in court, stated that the SLR extract was already ready with the Personal Assistant General to the first respondent and could be collected by the petitioner. The court recorded this submission and noted that the limited direction sought by the petitioner stood satisfied by the respondent’s readiness to provide the document. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition without any order as to costs, directing the petitioner to approach the Personal Assistant General with a copy of the order to collect the SLR extract. No other legal issues or contentions were raised, and the matter ended by consent, with the court declining to issue any formal mandamus beyond recording the government pleader’s undertaking. The judgment was delivered on 27.03.2025 and directed that a copy of the order be issued by 01.04.2025.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 - Consent Disposal Where Document Ready - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Petitioner sought mandamus directing the respondent to furnish survey and land register extract. Respondent’s counsel submitted that the SLR extract was ready with the Personal Assistant General to the first respondent and could be collected by the petitioner. The court recorded the submission and disposed of the writ petition without costs, directing the petitioner to approach the Personal Assistant General with a copy of the order to collect the document. Held that in view of the respondent’s readiness to provide the document, no further adjudication was required and the limited relief stood satisfied (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus for direction to the respondent to furnish extract of survey and land register.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition disposed of; petitioner directed to approach the Personal Assistant General to the first respondent with a copy of this order to collect the SLR extract; no costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
  • 1950
  • Survey and Land Register extract
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 333

W.P.(MD)No.8517 of 2025

2025-03-27

P.B. Balaji

K. Appadurai (Petitioner), M. Lingadurai (Respondent)

S.Boominathan

The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus

Remedy Sought

Direction to the respondent to furnish copy of the survey and land register extract

Filing Reason

Non-furnishing of the document despite application dated 10.01.2025

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to furnish the survey and land register extract

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought limited direction for the document; respondent's counsel submitted that the SLR extract was ready and could be collected, and that there was no difficulty in furnishing it

Ratio Decidendi

Where the government pleader on instructions states that the document sought by the petitioner is ready and can be collected, the court may dispose of the writ petition by recording the submission and issuing a direction for collection, without adjudicating on the merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks limited direction to the respondent to furnish the copy of the survey and land register. the learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions from the officer present in Court today, submits that the SLR extract is ready with the Personal Assistant General to the first respondent and the same can be collected by the petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied on 10.01.2025 for survey and land register extract; filed writ petition on an unspecified date; matter heard on 27.03.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Petitioner Directed to Submit Explanation Before Competent Authority. Show Cause Notice Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction; Petiti...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition for Survey and Land Register Extract — Direction to Furnish Document on Readiness Expressed by Government Pleader. Mandamus under Article 226 Allowed as Respondent Had No Objection to Furnishing SLR Extra...