Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Correction of FMB and Patta by Directing Consideration of Representations. Revenue Authorities Required to Consider Representations for Correction of Field Measurement Book Entries and Issuance of Patta for Land in Melathur Village, Pudukkottai District, Without Deciding Merits.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, Parameshwari, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the revenue authorities to correct the Field Measurement Book (FMB) entries and issue a patta for the land bearing S.No.230/15B situated at Melathur Village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. The petitioner claimed that her private patta land had been erroneously recorded as a 'Community Well' in the FMB. She had submitted representations dated 13.02.2025 and 14.03.2025 to the first respondent, with copies to the second and third respondents, but no action had been taken. The court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the Special Government Pleader for the respondents, noted that the relief sought was essentially for consideration of the representations. Without entering into the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding ownership or the correctness of the entries, the court deemed it appropriate to direct the competent authority to attend to the representations. Accordingly, the second respondent, the District Revenue Officer, was directed to consider the petitioner's representations on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs. This approach reflects the court's practice of granting a mandamus for consideration rather than deciding substantive rights in revenue matters at the writ stage, leaving factual determinations to the administrative authority. The judgment underscores the procedural remedy available under Article 226 to compel statutory authorities to perform their duties when representations remain pending.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226, Constitution of India - The petitioner's private patta land was reflected as a 'Community Well' in the FMB - Court directed the District Revenue Officer to consider representations dated 13.02.2025 and 14.03.2025 on merits within twelve weeks - Held, writ petition disposed of without costs (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition seeking a direction to correct FMB and issue patta should be allowed, and if so, what directions should be given.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent / District Revenue Officer to consider the petitioner's representations dated 13.02.2025 and 14.03.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Consideration of representation
  • No costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 320

W.P.(MD)No.7913 of 2025

2025-03-21

P.B. Balaji

K.C.Maniyarasu, M.Lingadurai

Parameshwari

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District; 2. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District; 3. The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ jurisdiction for correction of revenue records

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeking writ of mandamus to direct respondents to correct FMB and issue patta

Filing Reason

Petitioner's private patta land was wrongly recorded as 'Community Well' in FMB; representations made to authorities not acted upon

Issues

Whether the High Court should direct the revenue authorities to consider the petitioner's representations for correction of FMB and issuance of patta.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her land is wrongly recorded and representations need to be considered. Respondents represented by Special Government Pleader, no specific counter argument recorded.

Ratio Decidendi

In writ jurisdiction, the court may direct the competent authority to consider representations without entering into the merits, if the petitioner has a grievance regarding revenue entries.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner's private patta land has been reflected as a “Community Well” in the FMB. Considering the nature of the request made by the petitioner, it would suffice to direct the second respondent / District Revenue Officer, to consider the petitioner's representations on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.7913 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus. The petition was listed before Justice P.B. Balaji at the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. On 21.03.2025, the court passed an order disposing of the petition with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Seeking Correction of FMB and Patta by Directing Consideration of Representations. Revenue Authorities Required to Consider Representations for Correction of Field Measurement Book Entries and Issuance of Patt...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Patta Issuance as Withdrawn. Petitioner Sought Quashing of District Revenue Officer's Proceedings and Mandamus for Computerized Patta, but Withdrew Petition Without Adjudication.