Case Note & Summary
Background: The petitioner, V. Prakashkumar, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the police authorities (respondents 1 to 3) to consider his representation dated 30.01.2025. The dispute arose out of a family matter between the petitioner and his wife. Facts: The petitioner lodged a complaint through a representation against his wife and others, alleging a family dispute. The representation was submitted to the third respondent (Inspector of Police, Dindigul South Police Station), but no action was taken, prompting the writ petition. Legal Issues: The sole issue was whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to compel the police to consider the representation. Arguments: The petitioner contended that his representation remained unconsidered. The Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondents, submitted that the representation had been received and was under enquiry, and that the enquiry would be completed within one week. Court's Analysis: The court, after hearing both sides and perusing the records, noted the limited prayer. Given the assurance of the respondents that the enquiry was ongoing and would be completed shortly, the court found it appropriate to direct expeditious conclusion of the enquiry rather than keeping the writ petition pending. Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to complete the enquiry in accordance with law within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No costs were awarded.
Headnote
A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - Petition seeking direction to police to consider representation - Family dispute led to complaint/representation - Police stated representation under enquiry and would be completed in one week - Court directed third respondent to complete enquiry in accordance with law within one week from receipt of copy of order - Held that limited prayer sought could be granted, no need for detailed adjudication (Paras 5-6).
Issue of Consideration
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to direct the police to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.01.2025.
Final Decision
The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to complete the enquiry in accordance with law within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Law Points
- Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- direction to police to consider representation and complete enquiry in a time-bound manner
