Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Muniyandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus. He sought to quash the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.10761/2024/D5(L.Ref) dated 29.11.2024 issued by the District Revenue Officer, Theni District, and consequently direct the revenue authorities to issue a computerized patta in respect of survey numbers 3130/2, 3134/3, 3134/5 of Thamaraikulam Part – I, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District. The petitioner contended that the proceedings were arbitrary, illegal and without legal basis. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the submission, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and consequently closed the connected miscellaneous petitions. No adjudication on merits took place.
Issue of Consideration
Final Decision
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
Case Details
2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 246
W.P.(MD)No.123 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.108 & 109 of 2025
Mr.M.Sridharan for petitioner; Mrs.S.Jeyapriya for respondents 1-3; Mr.K.K.Kannan for respondent 4
1.The District Revenue Officer, Theni District, Theni; 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District; 3.The Tahsildar, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District; 4.Valarmathi
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash revenue proceedings denying patta and to compel issuance of computerized patta.
Remedy Sought
Quashing of District Revenue Officer's order dated 29.11.2024 and direction to issue computerized patta for survey numbers 3130/2, 3134/3, 3134/5 of Thamaraikulam Part – I, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.
Filing Reason
Petitioner claimed the proceedings were arbitrary, illegal and without legal basis.
Previous Decisions
None mentioned; petition withdrawn at hearing stage.
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal and made endorsement in Court bundle.
Judgment Excerpts
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Procedural History
Petitioner filed writ petition; on hearing date, counsel sought withdrawal; court dismissed as withdrawn.
Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India: Article 226
