Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition for Mandamus Seeking Escort to Avail Leave Under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as Infructuous. Commissioner of Police Tiruchirappalli Order Dated 22.03.2025 Rendered the Petition Infructuous, Leading to Closure Without Adjudication on Merits.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, C. Selvam, a convict presumably granted leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, approached the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The grievance was that the police authorities had failed to provide the necessary escort to enable him to avail the leave granted by the prison authorities. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, the Director General of Police, the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli, and the Additional Director General of Police/Prisons to forthwith provide the escort. While the writ petition was pending, the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli passed an order on 22.03.2025, which addressed the petitioner’s request. When the matter came up for hearing on 24.03.2025 before a Division Bench comprising Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice R. Poornima, the Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents brought this order to the court’s notice. The court observed that in view of this subsequent development, nothing further survived for adjudication. No arguments on the merits of the case were advanced or considered. The court did not pronounce any legal principle or ratio. Consequently, the writ petition was closed as infructuous. No order as to costs was passed. The outcome was neutral; the court did not grant or deny the mandamus but simply noted that the relief sought had become otiose due to the supervening event. The judgment is brief and contains no discussion on the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 or the scope of mandamus.

Headnote

A) Writ Jurisdiction - Mandamus - Infructuous Petition - Constitution of India, Article 226 - Petitioner sought mandamus to provide escort for leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. During pendency, the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli passed an order dated 22.03.2025 which resolved the grievance. Held that the petition became infructuous and was accordingly closed (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing respondents to provide escort for the petitioner to avail leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

In view of the order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli dated 22.03.2025, nothing survived for further adjudication. The writ petition stands closed.

Law Points

  • writ petition becomes infructuous when the grievance is resolved by subsequent order of the authority
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 240

W.P(MD)No.7100 of 2025

2025-03-24

Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, Justice R. Poornima

Mr. N. Pragalathan for petitioner, Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondents

C. Selvam

The State of Tamil Nadu, The Director General of Police, The Commissioner of Police Trichy, The Additional Director General of Police/Prisons

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for mandamus

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to respondents to forthwith provide escort to enable him to avail leave granted under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982

Filing Reason

Petitioner was granted leave but police escort was not being provided, preventing him from availing the leave

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing respondents to provide escort for the petitioner to avail leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner’s counsel argued for issuance of mandamus Respondents’ counsel submitted that the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli had passed an order dated 22.03.2025 addressing the grievance, rendering the petition infructuous

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the proceedings passed by the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli vide order, dated 22.03.2025, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ petition. Hence the Writ Petition stands closed.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition seeking mandamus. During pendency, Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli passed order on 22.03.2025. Court closed the petition on 24.03.2025 as infructuous.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982: Not specified
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition for Mandamus Seeking Escort to Avail Leave Under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as Infructuous. Commissioner of Police Tiruchirappalli Order Dated 22.03.2025 Rendered the Petition Infructuous, Lea...