Madras High Court Permits Mother to Take Custody of Minor Daughter Following Habeas Corpus Petition. Court Orders Custody Subject to Medical Examination and Recording of Statement Under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerns a habeas corpus petition filed by K. Muthu Selvi, the mother of a 14-year-old girl named Manishiya, seeking the production and custody of her daughter from the respondents, the State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police. The petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The minor girl had gone missing and was found to have left with a 16-year-old boy, with whom she had developed a friendship through Instagram. The police rescued the girl from the boy's native village and produced her before the court. Upon interaction with the minor, she expressed that she had left due to some disturbance and was now willing to return to her mother. The girl was then placed in Tirunelveli Saranalalayam Child Welfare Home. The court, after hearing both sides and considering the circumstances, permitted the petitioner to take custody of her daughter, but subject to conditions: completion of a medical examination and recording of her statement under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). The petition was closed with these directions, emphasizing the need to safeguard the minor's welfare while restoring her to her natural guardian. The order was pronounced on March 4, 2025, with the authenticated copy to be issued on March 10, 2025.

Headnote

A) Habeas Corpus - Custody of Minor - Production before Court and Directions for Custody - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 183 - In a habeas corpus petition filed by the mother seeking custody of her 14-year-old daughter, the court after producing the minor and interacting with her, found that she was willing to go with her mother. The court permitted the mother to take custody after medical examination and recording of statement under Section 183 BNSS. Held that in matters concerning minor's custody, the court must ensure the minor's welfare and compliance with procedural safeguards. (Paras 3-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the mother is entitled to custody of her minor daughter and whether the court should direct production and appropriate measures for the minor's welfare

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Habeas Corpus Petition is closed with directions: the petitioner is permitted to take custody of the minor daughter after completion of medical examination and recording of her statement under Section 183 of BNSS.

Law Points

  • In a habeas corpus petition for custody of a minor
  • the court may permit custody to the parent after ensuring the minor's willingness and subject to medical examination and recording of statement under Section 183 BNSS
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 213

H.C.P(MD)No.292 of 2025

2025-03-10

Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, Justice R. Poornima

Mr. T. Thirumurugan, Mr. E. Antony Sahaya Prabahar (Addl. Public Prosecutor)

K. Muthu Selvi

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Habeas Corpus petition seeking production and custody of petitioner's minor daughter.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (mother) sought direction to respondents to produce her minor daughter and hand over custody.

Filing Reason

The minor daughter, aged 14, had gone with a 16-year-old boy due to Instagram friendship, and the mother filed habeas corpus to regain custody.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to custody of her minor daughter, and whether the court should direct production and appropriate measures for the minor's welfare.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought custody of the minor daughter; she was willing to go with her mother. Respondent police produced the minor and stated that she was rescued from the boy's native village.

Ratio Decidendi

In a habeas corpus petition for custody of a minor, the court, after interaction with the minor and ensuring her willingness, may permit custody to the parent subject to medical examination and recording of statement under Section 183 BNSS for the minor's welfare.

Judgment Excerpts

The Habeas Corpus Petition is filed seeking a direction the respondents to produce the person or body of the Petitioner’s daughter namely, Manishiya, daughter of Karuthapandi, aged about 14, before this Court and hand over the custody to the Petitioner. On interaction with the minor girl, she now states that due to some disturbance, she has gone with XXX. She is now willing to go with her mother, the Petitioner herein. Presently, the girl is in Tirunelveli Saranalalayam Child Welfare Home. The Petitioner is permitted to take custody of the child after completion of medical examination and recording of her Statement under Section 183 of B.N.S.S.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed the habeas corpus petition; the police produced the minor girl; the court interacted with the minor and passed the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 183
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Permits Mother to Take Custody of Minor Daughter Following Habeas Corpus Petition. Court Orders Custody Subject to Medical Examination and Recording of Statement Under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Theft Conviction of Air Force Cadet for Unauthorised Flight of Aircraft. Temporary Unauthorised Use of Government Aircraft for Personal Purposes Amounts to Dishonest Misappropriation Under Section 378 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.