Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-09-08 05:40:01
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 58

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.3629 and 3631 of 2025

2025-03-03

R. Subramanian, G. Arul Murugan

2025:MHC:573

V. Ajoy Khose, M. Murali Vinodh, M. Bindran

G. Suseentharan (appellant in W.A.301) / Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Limited & Anr. (appellants in W.A.435 & 436)

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Limited & Ors. (respondents in W.A.301) / G. Suseentharan (respondent in W.A.435 & 436)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Remedy Sought

Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 02.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.139 of 2022 and W.P.No.33952 of 2023.

Previous Decisions

Common order dated 02.07.2024 in W.P.Nos.139 of 2022 and 33952 of 2023 by a Single Judge of the High Court.

Procedural History

The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 02.07.2024 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court in W.P.Nos.139 of 2022 and 33952 of 2023. W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025 are filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the said order. The appeals were reserved on 21.02.2025 and pronounced on 03.03.2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State Commission Order Passed Without President Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Harmonious Construction of Section 14(2) and 14(2A) with Section 29A and West Bengal Rules 6(9) and 6(10) Saved Proceedings from Invalidity Des... 2026-09-14 17:34:28
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Sale to Another Manufacturer for Further Processing Not a Contravention. The Court held that sale of Nitrous Oxide I.P. by a licensed manufacturer to ... 2026-09-14 17:34:26
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?