Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-07-31 12:31:24
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 58

W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025 and C.M.P.Nos.3629 and 3631 of 2025

2025-03-03

R. Subramanian, G. Arul Murugan

2025:MHC:573

V. Ajoy Khose, M. Murali Vinodh, M. Bindran

G. Suseentharan (appellant in W.A.301) / Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Limited & Anr. (appellants in W.A.435 & 436)

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Limited & Ors. (respondents in W.A.301) / G. Suseentharan (respondent in W.A.435 & 436)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Remedy Sought

Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 02.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.139 of 2022 and W.P.No.33952 of 2023.

Previous Decisions

Common order dated 02.07.2024 in W.P.Nos.139 of 2022 and 33952 of 2023 by a Single Judge of the High Court.

Procedural History

The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 02.07.2024 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court in W.P.Nos.139 of 2022 and 33952 of 2023. W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025 are filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the said order. The appeals were reserved on 21.02.2025 and pronounced on 03.03.2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court W.A.Nos.301, 435 and 436 of 2025 2026-07-31 12:31:24
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition for Mandamus Seeking Escort to Avail Leave Under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as Infructuous. Commissioner of Police Tiruchirappalli Order Dated 22.03.2025 Rendered the Petition Infructuous, Lea... 2026-07-31 12:31:24
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal Natural Justice murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?