Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Non-Harassment Direction Against Police During Enquiry. Court Accepts Police Assurance That No Harassment Occurred and Directs Consideration of Senior Citizen's Representation Within One Week.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a criminal original petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petition alleged that the first respondent police, on the basis of an online complaint lodged by the second respondent, were harassing him under the guise of an enquiry. The petitioner sought a direction that the police should not harass him and requested that his representation dated 26.11.2024 be considered. On the date of hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. The Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent police submitted that the police had only issued a summons to the petitioner, but the petitioner did not appear. The Government Advocate further stated that the police had not harassed the petitioner and undertook that they would consider the petitioner's representation and dispose of it within one week. Recording these submissions, the court disposed of the criminal original petition. No costs were ordered. The court did not issue any formal direction restraining the police, but accepted the assurance that the representation would be disposed of expeditiously. Thus, the petition was effectively closed without any finding of harassment or any adverse order against the police.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Police Harassment during Enquiry - Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a petition seeking a direction that the police not harass him during enquiry on a complaint; the police submitted that they had only summoned the petitioner and had not harassed him; they undertook to consider his representation and dispose of it within one week; the court accepted the assurance and disposed of the petition without granting a prohibitory order - Held that the petition is disposed of recording the statement of the Government Advocate and directing the police to consider and dispose of the representation within one week (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a senior citizen, is entitled to an order directing the police not to harass him under the guise of enquiry on a complaint made by the second respondent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of recording the submission of the Government Advocate that police have not harassed the petitioner and will consider the representation within one week.

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20955 of 2024

2025-03-04

P.Dhanabal

Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan, Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar

Senathipathi Pillai

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vilampatti Circle, Dindigul District; 2. P.Veerasivabalan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal original petition seeking direction to police not to harass petitioner during enquiry on complaint.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to the first respondent police not to harass him being a senior citizen under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of the second respondent, and to consider his representation dated 26.11.2024.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that police were harassing him during enquiry on an online complaint lodged by the second respondent, and he being a senior citizen sought protection.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to an order directing the police not to harass him during enquiry on a complaint?

Submissions/Arguments

The Government Advocate for the first respondent submitted that the police only issued summons to the petitioner, he did not appear, and they had not harassed him; they undertook to consider the petitioner's representation and dispose of it within one week.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the prayer sought for by the petitioner is only as against the first respondent and the first respondent also stated that they have not harassed the petitioner and only based on the complaint given by the second respondent they called the petitioner for enquiry. Recording the said submission of Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Procedural History

Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS 2023 on unspecified date. Matter listed on 04.03.2025; no appearance for petitioner; Government Advocate appeared for first respondent and made submissions. Petition disposed of on same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Non-Harassment Direction Against Police During Enquiry. Court Accepts Police Assurance That No Harassment Occurred and Directs Consideration of Senior Citizen's Representation Within One Week.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Renewal of Trademarks Despite Delay, Directs Registrar to Accept Renewal Applications. Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 25(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prevents Removal of Marks from Register.