Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies directions in a judicial officer's service matter pursuant to a miscellaneous application filed by the High Court on administrative side. The Court examined the scope of its earlier judgment regarding implementation of directions concerning suspension and pay.

Admin
2026-08-01 03:30:36
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (07) 35

Miscellaneous Application No. 2228 of 2026 in Civil Appeal No. 2029 of 2022

2026-07-29

J. B. Pardiwala, J.

2026 INSC 762

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

Abhay Jain

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous Application seeking clarification of judgment

Remedy Sought

Applicant High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan seeks clarification of the directions in the judgment dated 15.03.2022

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 15.03.2022 by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2029 of 2022 (Abhay Jain v. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan & Anr.)

Issues

Whether the directions in the judgment dated 15.03.2022 require clarification.

Judgment Excerpts

Delay condoned. This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan on its administrative side ... seeking clarification of the judgment & order dated 15.03.2022 rendered by this Court in the main matter i.e. Civil Appeal No. 2029 of 2022.

Procedural History

The main matter, Civil Appeal No. 2029 of 2022 arising out of SLP(C) No. 6107 of 2020, was decided by the Supreme Court on 15.03.2022. Thereafter, Miscellaneous Application No. 2228 of 2026 was filed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan on its administrative side seeking clarification of the said judgment.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
clarification of judgment miscellaneous application judicial officer service matter directions

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Notification for Food Supply to Hostels. Tender notification held not contrary to Rule 17(1)(b) of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000 as it was issued by the De... 2026-08-01 03:30:36
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 498A IPC also set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty beyond reasonable doubt. 2026-08-01 03:30:36
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder Compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt Limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?