High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn Regarding Single Window Approval Committee. The petitioner’s prayer to constitute the committee under Rule 320 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023 was not adjudicated as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by M/s. Diamond Graphics, a sole proprietorship represented by its proprietor R. Rajasekar, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the second and third respondents, namely the Commissioner of Police Traffic, Chennai, and the Chairman of the Single Window Approval Committee, Corporation of Chennai, to constitute and declare the Single Window Approval Committee and to process applications filed under Rule 320 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023. The first respondent was the Commissioner of the Corporation of Greater Chennai. The matter came up for hearing on 25 February 2025 before a Division Bench comprising Justice S. M. Subramaniam and Justice K. Rajasekar. At that time, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. G. Krishnamurthy, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect. The court, upon considering the endorsement, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and ordered no costs. The legal issues raised in the petition were never adjudicated upon, and the court did not record any submissions or arguments from the respondents' counsel, Mrs. K. Aswini Devi (standing counsel for respondents 1 and 3) and Mr. M. Babu Muthu Meeran (Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent 2). Consequently, no precedents were cited, no evidence was examined, and no determination on the merits was made. The petition was simply dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the substantive prayer unanswered.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Withdrawal of Petition - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to constitute a Single Window Approval Committee under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023. At the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw and made an endorsement. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs. Held that the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court should direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to constitute and declare the Single Window Approval Committee to process applications under Rule 320 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 192

WP No. 19198 of 2024

2025-02-25

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

2025:MHC:779

Dr.G.Krishnamurthy, Mrs.K.Aswini Devi, Mr.M.Babu Muthu Meeran

M/s.Diamond Graphics, Rep by Sole Proprietor, R.Rajasekar

1.The Commissioner, Corporation Of Greater Chennai, Chennai; 2.The Commissioner Of Police, Traffic, Chennai; 3.The Chairman, Single Window Approval Committee, Corporation Of Chennai, Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking a direction to constitute a Single Window Approval Committee under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to constitute and declare the Single Window Approval Committee to process applications filed under Rule 320 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.

Filing Reason

To obtain the constitution of the Single Window Approval Committee for processing applications under Rule 320.

Issues

Whether the 2nd and 3rd respondents should be directed to constitute and declare the Single Window Approval Committee to process applications under Rule 320 of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

Judgment Excerpts

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed seeking a mandamus. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 25-02-2025, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023: Rule 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn Regarding Single Window Approval Committee. The petitioner’s prayer to constitute the committee under Rule 320 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023 was not adjudicated as the petition was ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, a...