Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn and Directs Corporation to Implement Government Order under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. Petitioner's counsel, after arguments, agreed to abide by the order but had not complied for over 1.5 years; Court directed authorities to ensure implementation within two months if petitioner fails.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by the owner of a premises in Anna Nagar, Chennai, who sought a direction from the High Court to the Corporation of Chennai officials to remove a lock and seal they had affixed on the property. The background involved a government order dated 22.08.2023, passed under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, which granted the petitioner three months to comply with its directions. The petitioner, however, did not carry out the directions for over one and a half years beyond that period. When the writ petition came up for hearing, the petitioner's counsel argued the matter for a considerable time, but then made a submission that the petitioner would abide by the government order. The Court noted the significant delay in compliance and directed the authorities to ensure that the government order is implemented within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the court's order, in the event the petitioner again failed to comply. Following this observation, the petitioner's counsel chose to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, with no costs. The core legal issue was whether the writ should be allowed when the petitioner belatedly agreed to comply with the administrative order. The court's reasoning implicitly endorsed the binding nature of the government order and the need for its enforcement after prolonged non-compliance, treating the withdrawal as an acceptance of the obligation. The final decision dismissed the petition, leaving the government order operative and placing a duty on the authorities to enforce it within a definite timeline if the petitioner defaulted. No substantive legal principles were laid down, as the petition was disposed of without adjudication on merits.

Headnote

A) Town and Country Planning - Building Regulation - Enforcement of Government Order - Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, Section 80A - The petitioner's counsel, after arguments, submitted that the petitioner would abide by the Government order dated 22.08.2023 passed under Section 80A, but the three-month compliance period had expired and no action was taken for over one and a half years. The Court directed the authorities to ensure implementation of the Government order within two months if the petitioner fails to comply, and the petitioner then withdrew the writ petition. Held that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with directions. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition seeking removal of lock and seal should be allowed when the petitioner agrees to abide by the government order under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, but has not complied for over one and a half years

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. The authorities are directed to ensure implementation of the Government order dated 22.08.2023 within two months from receipt of a copy of this order, if the petitioner fails to comply. No costs.

Law Points

  • Government order under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act
  • 1971
  • is binding
  • authorities must enforce such order
  • writ petition seeking removal of lock and seal can be withdrawn with directions for compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 186

WP No. 6151 of 2025

2025-02-21

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

2025:MHC:776

V.C. Selvasekaran for petitioner; K. Aswini Devi for respondents

Mr. Francis Augustine

1. The Executive Engineer, Division 103, Corporation Of Chennai, Zone-VIII; 2. The Assistant Engineer, Division 103, Corporation Of Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus directing respondents to remove lock and seal affixed on petitioner's premises.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought removal of lock and seal on his property at Door No.AG-9, Old No.2B, Shanthi Colony, 4th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai.

Filing Reason

The respondents, Corporation of Chennai officials, had affixed a lock and seal on the premises, presumably due to some violation of building regulations, and the petitioner wanted it removed.

Previous Decisions

Government Order dated 22.08.2023 passed under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, granting three months for compliance.

Issues

Whether the writ petition seeking removal of lock and seal should be allowed when the petitioner agrees to abide by the government order under Section 80A but has not complied for over one and a half years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel initially argued for removal of lock and seal, but later submitted that the petitioner would abide by the Government Order dated 22.08.2023. Respondents' counsel likely opposed the petition and sought enforcement of the government order, emphasizing the long delay in compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

When a petitioner, after arguing a writ petition, submits that he will abide by a government order and then withdraws the petition, the Court may dismiss the petition as withdrawn while directing authorities to implement the government order if the petitioner fails to comply within a specified time.

Judgment Excerpts

The three-months time granted by the Government had expired long ago. Despite the lapse of over one and half years, the petitioner had not carried out the directions issued by the Government. the authorities are directed to ensure that the order of the Government is implemented within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in the event of failure on the part of the petitioner in complying with the Government. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner has chosen to withdraw the writ petition.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP No. 6151 of 2025 seeking removal of lock and seal. The Government had earlier passed an order under Section 80A on 22.08.2023, granting three months for compliance. Petitioner did not comply for over one and a half years. At hearing on 21-02-2025, petitioner's counsel expressed willingness to abide by the government order and then withdrew the petition. The court issued directions for implementation of the government order and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971: Section 80A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Promoter in PMLA Case Citing Long Incarceration and Delayed Trial. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA were not satisfied and that continued detention violated Article 21.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition for Enforcement of Building Plan Violations. Court Examines Prayer for Mandamus to Direct Authorities to Act Against Unauthorized Construction in Kancheepuram District.