Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions for Mandamus to Demolish Unauthorized Constructions — Petitioners Allege Illegal Construction by Private Respondents on Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 164

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

2025-02-20

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR

Dharani for P.Santhosh, B.Divakaran, E.Vijayanand, C.Manoharan, D.B.R.Prabhu, C.Umashankar, Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar

M.Karthick, K.Prema

Government of Tamil Nadu, CMDA, Greater Chennai Corporation, Syed Shagiullah, Syed Namath, Syed Shafiullah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 seeking mandamus for demolition of unauthorized constructions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to authorities to demolish unauthorized constructions.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions by private respondents on specified premises.

Judgment Excerpts

W.P.No.37844 of 2024 has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 and 4 therein to demolish and remove the unauthorized construction in Survey Nos. 108, 109, No. 109, Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034 made by the 5th and 6th respondents therein.

Procedural History

Two writ petitions (W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024) were filed and heard together; a common order was passed on 20.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions for Mandamus to Demolish Unauthorized Constructions — Petitioners Allege Illegal Construction by Private Respondents on Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Status Under MRTU & PULP Act Defined. Stenographer promoted to Officer (Training) held not an 'employee' under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & P...