Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions for Mandamus to Demolish Unauthorized Constructions — Petitioners Allege Illegal Construction by Private Respondents on Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-09-09 13:08:32
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 164

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

2025-02-20

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR

Dharani for P.Santhosh, B.Divakaran, E.Vijayanand, C.Manoharan, D.B.R.Prabhu, C.Umashankar, Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar

M.Karthick, K.Prema

Government of Tamil Nadu, CMDA, Greater Chennai Corporation, Syed Shagiullah, Syed Namath, Syed Shafiullah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 seeking mandamus for demolition of unauthorized constructions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to authorities to demolish unauthorized constructions.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions by private respondents on specified premises.

Judgment Excerpts

W.P.No.37844 of 2024 has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 and 4 therein to demolish and remove the unauthorized construction in Survey Nos. 108, 109, No. 109, Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034 made by the 5th and 6th respondents therein.

Procedural History

Two writ petitions (W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024) were filed and heard together; a common order was passed on 20.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ of mandamus unauthorized construction demolition Article 226 of Constitution of India Kodambakkam High Road

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Income Tax Department in Dividend Assignment Case: Deed Transferring Future Dividends to Wife Not a Transfer of Existing Property. Voluntary Covenant to Pay Over Dividends Received Was Merely Application of Income, Assessable in... 2026-09-13 21:15:33
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Custody of Minor Child, Upholding Natural Guardian's Right. Father's Entitlement to Custody Affirmed as Private Respondents Failed to Show Disqualification, and Child Was Handed Over. 2026-09-13 21:15:32
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?