Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions for Mandamus to Demolish Unauthorized Constructions — Petitioners Allege Illegal Construction by Private Respondents on Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-10-23 09:47:48
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 164

W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024

2025-02-20

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR

Dharani for P.Santhosh, B.Divakaran, E.Vijayanand, C.Manoharan, D.B.R.Prabhu, C.Umashankar, Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar

M.Karthick, K.Prema

Government of Tamil Nadu, CMDA, Greater Chennai Corporation, Syed Shagiullah, Syed Namath, Syed Shafiullah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 seeking mandamus for demolition of unauthorized constructions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to authorities to demolish unauthorized constructions.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions by private respondents on specified premises.

Judgment Excerpts

W.P.No.37844 of 2024 has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 and 4 therein to demolish and remove the unauthorized construction in Survey Nos. 108, 109, No. 109, Kodambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034 made by the 5th and 6th respondents therein.

Procedural History

Two writ petitions (W.P.Nos.37844 & 39614 of 2024) were filed and heard together; a common order was passed on 20.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ of mandamus unauthorized construction demolition Article 226 of Constitution of India Kodambakkam High Road

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Detention Under Anti-Social Activities Act Due to Property Grabbing. Delegation of Powers Validated as Necessary for Public Order Maintenance. 2026-11-03 02:31:29
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment. 2026-11-03 02:31:24
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation Jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...

Lost Your Password?