Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition as Withdrawn — Father Seeks Production of Daughter Allegedly Detained Illegally. The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for production of a 21-year-old woman named Pebina, was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner’s counsel without any adjudication on the legality of the detention.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, E.Murugan, father of the detenue Pebina, aged about 21 years, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, praying for a direction to the respondents—the Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District, and the Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station—to produce the detenue and set her at liberty. The petition was registered in connection with Crime No.105 of 2025. On 27.02.2025, when the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the court to withdraw the petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the court dismissed the Habeas Corpus Petition as withdrawn. No legal issues were framed, no arguments were advanced on merits, and no ratio was laid down; the order is purely procedural, recording the withdrawal.

Headnote

A) Habeas Corpus - Withdrawal of Petition - Habeas corpus petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request - Constitution of India, Article 226 - Petitioner, father of the detenue Pebina (21 years), sought production of his daughter alleging illegal detention by police in Crime No.105 of 2025. On hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw and made an endorsement. Held: In view of the withdrawal, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No determination on merits. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

H.C.P(MD)No.269 of 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Habeas Corpus Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 30

H.C.P(MD)No.269 of 2025

2025-02-27

Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, Ms. Justice R. Poornima

2025:MHC:567

Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabu, Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar

E.Murugan

The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District, and The Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Habeas Corpus Petition

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought production of his daughter Pebina, aged 21, allegedly illegally detained, and to set her at liberty.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal detention of his daughter by police authorities in connection with Crime No.105 of 2025.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel for the Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Habeas Corpus Petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Habeas Corpus Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed H.C.P(MD)No.269 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking habeas corpus for production of his daughter. On 27.02.2025, when the matter was heard, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition as Withdrawn — Father Seeks Production of Daughter Allegedly Detained Illegally. The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for production of a 21-year-old ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition in Property Tax Dispute with State Government. Government land leased to private contractor for toll bridge construction is exempt from municipal property tax under Section 127 of the Bomba...