High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Service Matter — Transfer Held to Be an Incident of Service. Petitioner's Transfer from Belgaum to Bangalore was in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malice or Violation of Statutory Rules.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, B.G. Rajagopal, a Surveyor in the Department of Survey Settlement and Land Records, was transferred from Belgaum to Bangalore by an official memorandum dated 13.08.2012 issued by the 2nd respondent. He filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to relieve him from his duties at Belgaum pursuant to the transfer order. The petitioner contended that the transfer was mala fide and in violation of statutory rules. The High Court of Karnataka, after hearing the parties, held that transfer is an incident of service and a condition of service. Courts should not interfere with transfer orders unless they are mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner has no vested right to be posted at a particular place. The transfer order was passed in public interest and administrative exigency. The petitioner failed to establish any mala fides or violation of rules. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Incident of Service - Transfer is an incident of service and a condition of service. Courts should not interfere with transfer orders unless they are mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner has no vested right to be posted at a particular place. (Paras 4-6)

B) Service Law - Transfer - Public Interest - Transfer order passed in public interest and administrative exigency cannot be interfered with lightly. The petitioner failed to establish mala fides or violation of rules. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer order dated 13.08.2012 transferring the petitioner from Belgaum to Bangalore is liable to be quashed on grounds of mala fides or violation of statutory rules.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer is an incident of service
  • Courts should not interfere with transfer orders unless mala fide or in violation of statutory rules
  • Petitioner has no vested right to be posted at a particular place
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 19

Writ Petition No.38257/2012 (S-TR)

2013-03-13

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

C.M. Nagabhushan for P.N. Rajeswara (for petitioner), Raghavendra G. Gayatri, HCGP (for respondents)

B.G. Rajagopal

The Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore South Sub-Division; The Assistant Director of Land Record, Belgaum; The Commissioner, Department of Survey Settlement and Land Records, Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a transfer order in service matter

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to relieve the petitioner from his duties as Surveyor from the office of the 2nd respondent pursuant to the official memorandum dated 13.08.2012

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the transfer order dated 13.08.2012 transferring him from Belgaum to Bangalore

Issues

Whether the transfer order dated 13.08.2012 is liable to be quashed on grounds of mala fides or violation of statutory rules

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that the transfer was mala fide and in violation of statutory rules Respondents argued that transfer is an incident of service and the order was passed in public interest

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer is an incident of service and a condition of service. Courts should not interfere with transfer orders unless they are mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner has no vested right to be posted at a particular place.

Judgment Excerpts

Transfer is an incident of service and a condition of service. Courts should not interfere with transfer orders unless they are mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner has no vested right to be posted at a particular place.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. It was reserved for orders and pronounced on 13.03.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in Service Matter — Transfer Held to Be an Incident of Service. Petitioner's Transfer from Belgaum to Bangalore was in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malice or Violation of ...