Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Installation of Periyar Statue in Maharashtra. No Enforceable Legal Right to Install Statue of Person Unconnected to State, and Police Report Indicates Law and Order Concerns.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Manav Vikas Va Punarnirman Sanshodhan Sanstha, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to quash the decision of the Statue Committee, Chatrapati Sambhajinagar, dated 9 April 2025, which denied permission to install a statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar on Gut No. 278, Grampanchayat Property No. 5667, situated at Waluj, Lanzi Road Area, Taluka Gangapur, District Chatrapati Sambhajinagar. The petitioner also sought a consequential direction to grant permission. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and the Assistant Government Pleader for the State, and perused the documents and a confidential police report. The court noted that the petitioner sought to install a statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar, who has no connection with the State of Maharashtra. The police inspector's report was adverse to the installation, and permission was rejected on the ground that it would lead to a law and order situation. The court held that the petitioner has no enforceable legal right to claim that permission must be granted. Finding no illegality or perversity in the denial, the court dismissed the writ petition as devoid of merit.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Enforceable Legal Right - Petitioner sought direction to install statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar, who has no connection with Maharashtra - Police report adverse, permission denied on law and order grounds - Held that petitioner has no enforceable legal right to claim permission, and no illegality or perversity in denial (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner has an enforceable legal right to compel the installation of a statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar in Maharashtra, and whether the refusal on grounds of law and order is illegal or perverse.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed as devoid of merit.

Law Points

  • No enforceable legal right to install statue
  • Writ jurisdiction not available for mere permission
  • Law and order as valid ground for refusal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 142

WRIT PETITION NO. 315 OF 2026

2026-07-07

NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

2026:BHC-AUG:26842-DB

Mr. Nitin Tribhuwan, Mr. S.K. Tambe

Manav Vikas Va Punarnirman Sanshodhan Sanstha

The State Of Maharashtra And Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to install statue and quash decision of Statue Committee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of decision dated 9.04.2025 of Statue Committee and direction to grant permission to install statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's request to install statue was rejected by Statue Committee on law and order grounds.

Previous Decisions

Statue Committee, Chatrapati Sambhajinagar, consisting of respondent nos. 2 to 6, rejected permission on 9.04.2025.

Issues

Whether petitioner has enforceable legal right to install statue of person unconnected to Maharashtra? Whether refusal on law and order grounds is illegal or perverse?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for permission to install statue. State opposed on ground of law and order situation based on police report.

Ratio Decidendi

Petitioner has no enforceable legal right to claim permission to install statue of a person having no concern with the State, and denial on law and order grounds is not illegal or perverse.

Judgment Excerpts

Admittedly, petitioner seeks direction to install the statue of Periyar Ramaswami Naykar, who has whatsoever no concern with the State of Maharashtra. Petitioner has no enforceable legal right to claim that permission must be granted to install the statue. We do not find any illegality or perversity in denying permission to the petitioner.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition before Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging decision of Statue Committee dated 9.04.2025. Court heard arguments and dismissed petition on 7.07.2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Interim Order of SC/ST Commission for Lack of Jurisdiction — Commission Cannot Issue Binding Interim Directions. The Court held that the Goa Commission for SC/ST exceeded its jurisdiction by passing an interim di...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Installation of Periyar Statue in Maharashtra. No Enforceable Legal Right to Install Statue of Person Unconnected to State, and Police Report Indicates Law and Order Concerns.