High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere presence at scene without overt act or common intention does not attract murder charge under Section 106(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 to 3, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No.177/2026 registered by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Section 106(1) of BNS, 2023. The FIR was lodged on 27.05.2026 by respondent No.2, Sonu Machwar, alleging that the petitioners had committed murder. The petitioners contended that the FIR did not disclose any overt act or common intention on their part and that they were falsely implicated. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the allegations in the FIR, even if taken at face value, did not make out a prima facie case against the petitioners. The court observed that mere presence at the scene of crime without any specific role or common intention does not attract the offence of murder under Section 106(1) BNS. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR insofar as it related to the petitioners, holding that continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Section 528 BNS, 2023 - Inherent Powers - Petitioners sought quashing of FIR registered for murder under Section 106(1) BNS, 2023 - Court examined whether allegations prima facie disclose commission of offence - Held that where FIR does not disclose any overt act or common intention, continuation of proceedings amounts to abuse of process of law (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered against the petitioners for offences punishable under Section 106(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, deserves to be quashed for lack of prima facie material.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. FIR No.177/2026 registered by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Section 106(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, is quashed insofar as it relates to petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Lack of prima facie case
  • Section 106(1) BNS
  • 2023
  • Common intention
  • Overt act
  • Abuse of process of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (07) 23

WP No. 18978 of 2026 (GM-RES)

2026-07-09

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri. Karthik Kumar K. for petitioners, Sri. B.N. Jagadeesha, SPP-1 for R1

Sri. Velu @ Velmayil Somu, Sri. Abhishek Surana, Sri. Alok. S. Sundar

The State of Karnataka, Sonu Machwar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.177/2026 registered by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station for offences under Section 106(1) BNS, 2023

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged false implication in murder case without any overt act or common intention

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses any prima facie case against the petitioners for offence under Section 106(1) BNS, 2023 Whether continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that FIR does not disclose any overt act or common intention on their part Respondent State opposed the petition, but no specific arguments recorded in the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

Where the FIR does not disclose any overt act or common intention on the part of the accused, and the allegations even if taken at face value do not make out a prima facie case, the continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing of the FIR.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners – accused Nos.1 to 3 stand at the doors of this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.177/2026, pending before the 46th Additional CMM Court Bangalore City.

Procedural History

FIR No.177/2026 was registered on 27.05.2026 by Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station for offence under Section 106(1) BNS, 2023. Petitioners filed WP No.18978/2026 under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution read with Section 528 BNS seeking quashing. The petition came up for preliminary hearing and was disposed of on 09.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 106(1)
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Documents in Bank Recovery Suit — Stamp Duty Objection Must Be Raised at Time of Marking. Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 does not mandate impounding after documents are...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Rejecting 'B' Final Report in Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Case — Lack of Proper Application of Mind and Non-Compliance with Section 173 Cr.P.C. The court held that the Magistrate must apply his mind to t...