High Court of Karnataka Quashes Registrar's Endorsement in Co-operative Society Dispute — Registrar Must Entertain Dispute Under Section 70 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The Joint Registrar's refusal to entertain a dispute on the ground of limitation was set aside as the dispute involved a continuing cause of action regarding misappropriation of society funds.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are members of the Dakshina Kannada Krishikara Maarata Sangha Niyamita (a co-operative society), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014 issued by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore. By the impugned endorsement, the Joint Registrar declined to entertain a dispute raised by the petitioners under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 on the ground that the dispute was barred by limitation. The petitioners contended that the dispute involved allegations of misappropriation of society funds by the office bearers, which constituted a continuing cause of action, and therefore the Registrar ought to have entertained the dispute. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the dispute regarding misappropriation of funds by office bearers of a co-operative society is a continuing cause of action and the Registrar cannot refuse to entertain the dispute on the ground of limitation. The Court quashed the impugned endorsement and directed the Joint Registrar to entertain the dispute and decide it on its merits in accordance with law. The writ petitions were allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Dispute Resolution - Section 70 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Limitation - The Joint Registrar declined to entertain a dispute under Section 70 on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The High Court held that where the dispute involves misappropriation of funds by office bearers of a co-operative society, it constitutes a continuing cause of action, and the Registrar cannot refuse to entertain the dispute solely on limitation grounds. The impugned endorsement was quashed and the Registrar was directed to entertain the dispute and decide it on merits. (Paras 1-3)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India - Quashing of Administrative Order - The High Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, quashed an endorsement issued by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies which refused to entertain a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The Court held that the Registrar's action was erroneous as the dispute involved a continuing cause of action and directed the Registrar to proceed with the dispute in accordance with law. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies was justified in refusing to entertain a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 on the ground of limitation, when the dispute involved allegations of misappropriation of society funds constituting a continuing cause of action.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014, and directed the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore, to entertain the dispute raised by the petitioners under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and decide it on its merits in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 70 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • Dispute resolution
  • Continuing cause of action
  • Limitation
  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (04) 41

WP Nos.38933/2014 & 639-640/2015 (CS-RES)

2015-03-19

H.G. Ramesh

Sri G. Balakrishna Shastry (for petitioners), Sri Tharanath Poojary (AGA for R1), Sri P. Karunakar (for R4)

K. Gopal Krishna Bhat, Shambunumbudari, Ram Kumar Hebbar

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore Regional Office; Dakshina Kannada Krishikara Maarata Sangha Niyamita; Dakshina Kannada Krishikara Maarata Sangha Niyamita Administrative Office; M/s M.A. Smart Builders and Developers Private Limited; Balakrishna D.B; P.G. Sathyanarayana Prasad; Sanjeeva Moily; M.S. Marathe

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies refusing to entertain a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014 passed by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore, and a direction to entertain the dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Filing Reason

The Joint Registrar declined to entertain the dispute raised by the petitioners under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 on the ground that it was barred by limitation.

Previous Decisions

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore, passed an endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014 refusing to entertain the dispute.

Issues

Whether the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies was justified in refusing to entertain a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 on the ground of limitation, when the dispute involved allegations of misappropriation of society funds constituting a continuing cause of action.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the dispute involved misappropriation of funds by office bearers of the co-operative society, which is a continuing cause of action, and therefore the Registrar ought to have entertained the dispute.

Ratio Decidendi

A dispute regarding misappropriation of funds by office bearers of a co-operative society constitutes a continuing cause of action, and the Registrar under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 cannot refuse to entertain such a dispute solely on the ground of limitation. The Registrar must entertain the dispute and decide it on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

By the impugned endorsement at Annexure-A, the joint Registrar has declined to entertain the dispute raised by the petitioners under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (‘the Act’ for short) on the ground that the dispute is barred by limitation. The dispute regarding misappropriation of funds by the office bearers of a co-operative society is a continuing cause of action. Hence, the Registrar cannot refuse to entertain the dispute on the ground of limitation. In the result, the writ petitions are allowed. The impugned endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014 is quashed. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore is directed to entertain the dispute raised by the petitioners under Section 70 of the Act and decide it on its merits in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an endorsement dated 21/22.2.2014 issued by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mysore, which declined to entertain a dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 on the ground of limitation. The High Court heard the matter and delivered the judgment on 19 March 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: Section 70
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Registrar's Endorsement in Co-operative Society Dispute — Registrar Must Entertain Dispute Under Section 70 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The Joint Registrar's refusal to entertain a dispute on the g...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff's Writ Petition in Court Fee Computation Case — Gift Deed Cancellation Suit Requires Court Fee on Market Value Under Section 38 of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.