Case Note & Summary
The petitioners were employees of Mandya National Paper Mills (MNPM), a company incorporated under the Companies Act that suffered huge losses. The Central Government issued an official memorandum dated 05.05.2000 (Annexure-B) introducing a voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) applicable to all sick units, amending an earlier scheme dated 05.10.1988. The scheme aimed to extend benefits to employees while enabling public sector enterprises to rationalize surplus manpower. The relevant clause (5) of the scheme provided for computation of ex-gratia for sick and unviable units. The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a reply dated 05.02.2007 (Annexure-E) as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21. The court examined the scheme and found that the computation of ex-gratia based on last drawn salary and remaining service was not arbitrary. The court noted that the scheme was formulated by the Government keeping in mind the interest of employees and the need to rationalize surplus manpower. The court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the scheme was reasonable and did not violate constitutional provisions.
Headnote
A) Constitutional Law - Articles 14, 16, 21 - Voluntary Retirement Scheme - Computation of ex-gratia - The petitioners challenged the computation of ex-gratia under the VRS for sick units as arbitrary. The court held that the scheme was formulated by the Government keeping in mind the interest of employees and the need to rationalize surplus manpower in public sector enterprises. The computation based on last drawn salary and remaining service was not arbitrary and did not violate Articles 14, 16, and 21. (Paras 1-5)
B) Industrial Law - Voluntary Retirement Scheme - Sick Units - Clause (5) of the scheme dated 05.05.2000 provided for ex-gratia computation for sick and unviable units. The court upheld the scheme as reasonable and not discriminatory. (Paras 2-5)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the computation of ex-gratia amount under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for sick units based on last drawn salary and remaining service is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Final Decision
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the computation of ex-gratia under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for sick units based on last drawn salary and remaining service was not arbitrary and did not violate Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Law Points
- Voluntary Retirement Scheme
- Sick Industrial Companies
- Ex-gratia computation
- Last drawn salary
- Remaining service
- Arbitrariness
- Articles 14
- 16
- 21
Case Details
2016 LawText (KAR) (07) 54
W.P.No.15448/2008 (S-R) & W.P.Nos.16153-59/2008 (S-R)
Sri M. Narayana Bhat, Sri Subba Rao & Co., Sri Anian Joseph, Sri Arvind Moorchung, M/s. King & Partridge, Sri K.S. Mahadevan
The Workman of Mandya National Paper Mills, M/s Mandya National Paper Mills Officers Guild, M/s Mandya National Paper Mills Staff Union, Mr. Prakash, Mr. P.K. Kyathaiah, Mr. P. Rajashekar, Mr. M. Lokesh, Mr. Joba Saldana
The Union of India, Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd., The Mandya National Paper Mills (In Liquidation)
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a reply dated 05.02.2007 as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21.
Remedy Sought
Quashing of the reply dated 05.02.2007 (Annexure-E) as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution.
Filing Reason
The petitioners, employees of Mandya National Paper Mills, challenged the computation of ex-gratia under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for sick units as arbitrary.
Issues
Whether the computation of ex-gratia under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for sick units based on last drawn salary and remaining service is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Submissions/Arguments
The petitioners argued that the computation of ex-gratia under the VRS for sick units was arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution.
The respondents contended that the scheme was formulated by the Government keeping in mind the interest of employees and the need to rationalize surplus manpower, and the computation was reasonable.
Ratio Decidendi
The Voluntary Retirement Scheme for sick units, as contained in the official memorandum dated 05.05.2000, was formulated by the Government keeping in mind the interest of employees and the need to rationalize surplus manpower in public sector enterprises. The computation of ex-gratia based on last drawn salary and remaining service is reasonable and not arbitrary, and does not violate Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution.
Judgment Excerpts
All the petitioners were employees of Mandya National Paper Mills (for short ‘MNPM’). It was a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act. It suffered huge loss.
In order to extend certain benefits to employees working therein, Central Government issued official memorandum dated 05.05.2000 vide Annexure-B. This was a voluntary retirement scheme applicable to all sick units.
Relevant clause in the said scheme (Annexure-B) for the purpose of this case is clause (5). It states that for sick and unviable units, the VS...
Procedural History
The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a reply dated 05.02.2007 (Annexure-E) as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21. The petitions came up for final hearing before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on 27.07.2016.
Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 227
- Companies Act:
