High Court of Karnataka Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Payment of Full Wages Under Section 17B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 from Date of Award. Workman Entitled to Wages from Date of Award, Not from Date of Application Under Section 17B.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a workman, C.M. Nagaraj, who was reinstated by an award of a Labour Court or Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The employer, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the award in a writ petition before the High Court. During the pendency of that writ petition, the workman filed an application under Section 17B of the Act seeking payment of full wages last drawn. The learned Single Judge directed payment of wages from the date of filing of the application under Section 17B, not from the date of the award. The workman appealed against this order. The core legal issue was whether, under Section 17B, the workman is entitled to wages from the date of the award or from the date of filing the application. The appellant argued that the entitlement arises from the date of the award, while the employer contended that it arises only from the date the workman files an affidavit seeking such payment. The court examined the language of Section 17B, which states that the employer shall be liable to pay full wages last drawn "during the period of pendency of such proceedings in the High Court or the Supreme Court." The court reasoned that the period of pendency begins from the date of the award, as the proceedings against the award are filed thereafter. Therefore, the workman is entitled to wages from the date of the award. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Single Judge's order and directing payment from the date of the award.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes Act - Section 17B - Payment of Full Wages Pending Proceedings - Date of Entitlement - The issue was whether a workman is entitled to wages under Section 17B from the date of the award or from the date of filing the application. The court held that the workman is entitled to wages from the date of the award, as the section provides for payment during the period of pendency of proceedings in higher courts, which commences from the date of the award. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether, under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the workman is entitled to payment of full wages from the date of the award or from the date of filing the application under Section 17B.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge is set aside. The workman is entitled to payment of full wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 from the date of the award.

Law Points

  • Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • payment of full wages pending proceedings in higher courts
  • date from which wages are payable
  • workman's entitlement from date of award
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (02) 30

Writ Appeal No.3485 of 2015 (L-KSRTC)

2016-02-18

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee (Acting Chief Justice), Ravi Malimath

L. Shekar (for appellant), H.R. Renuka (for respondent)

C.M. Nagaraj

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of Single Judge regarding payment of wages under Section 17B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of Single Judge's order and direction for payment of wages from date of award.

Filing Reason

Single Judge directed payment of wages under Section 17B from date of filing application, not from date of award.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge in Writ Petition No.61057/2014 dated 31.8.2015 directed payment from date of filing application under Section 17B.

Issues

Whether under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the workman is entitled to full wages from the date of the award or from the date of filing the application under Section 17B.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: Workman entitled to payment under Section 17B from date of award. Respondent: Workman entitled to compensation from date of filing affidavit seeking payment.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the workman is entitled to full wages last drawn from the date of the award, as the period of pendency of proceedings in higher courts commences from the date of the award.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 17B of the said Act runs as under: '17B. Payment of full wages to workman pending proceedings in higher courts- Where in any case, a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal by its award directs reinstatement of any workman and the employer prefers any proceedings against such award in a High Court or the Supreme Court, the employer shall be liable to pay such workman, during the period of pendency of such proceedings in the High Court or the Supreme Court, full wages last drawn by him...' The workman is entitled to payment of full wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 from the date of the award.

Procedural History

The Labour Court/Tribunal passed an award directing reinstatement of the workman. The employer filed Writ Petition No.61057/2014 challenging the award. During pendency, the workman filed an application under Section 17B. The Single Judge directed payment from date of application. The workman appealed in Writ Appeal No.3485/2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 17B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim - Compensation Enhanced for Death of Labourer Due to Wrong Multiplier. Multiplier of 18 applied instead of 12 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for deceased aged 24 years earning Rs.1400 per month.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Due to Non-Payment of Balance Consideration and Failure to Clear Encumbrances. Court sets aside decree for specific performance and directs refund of ea...