Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition of Building in Cunningham Cross Road, Holding That Show-Cause Notice and Demolition Order Were Invalid for Non-Compliance With Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Hearing Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The court set aside the demolition order and directed fresh proceedings with proper hearing.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by Sri Shantesh Gureddi and others, and M/s Roerich Hotels Pvt Ltd, against the Commissioner and Assistant Executive Engineer of Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagar Palike (BBMP) and others. The dispute pertains to a show-cause notice dated 24.11.2015 and a demolition order dated 26.11.2015 issued by the BBMP Commissioner regarding alleged unauthorized constructions on properties located at Cunningham Cross Road, Bangalore. The appellants challenged these orders before a learned Single Judge, who dismissed the writ petitions. Aggrieved, the appellants filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The appellants argued that the show-cause notice was vague, did not specify the exact unauthorized portions, and that no proper opportunity of hearing was given before passing the demolition order. They contended that the principles of natural justice were violated. The respondents, including the BBMP and the Citizens Forum for Safe Environment, supported the demolition order, claiming that the constructions were illegal and caused public nuisance. The Division Bench of the High Court, comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Budihal R.B., examined the records and found that the show-cause notice was issued on 24.11.2015, calling for objections within 24 hours, and the demolition order was passed on 26.11.2015 without considering the objections filed by the appellants. The court held that the Commissioner failed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing, which is mandatory under Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The court also noted that the notice did not clearly identify the unauthorized portions, making the demolition order arbitrary. Consequently, the court allowed the appeals, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge, and quashed the show-cause notice and demolition order. The court directed the BBMP to issue a fresh notice after giving a proper opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Demolition of Building - Show-Cause Notice - Natural Justice - The show-cause notice dated 24.11.2015 and demolition order dated 26.11.2015 were issued without proper hearing and violated principles of natural justice - The Commissioner failed to consider the appellants' objections and did not provide an opportunity of hearing - Held that the demolition order was invalid and set aside (Paras 10-15).

B) Municipal Law - Section 321 Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Demolition of Unauthorized Construction - The power under Section 321 must be exercised after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing - The notice did not specify the exact unauthorized portions and the demolition order was passed without proper application of mind - Held that the order was unsustainable (Paras 16-20).

C) Writ Appeal - Maintainability - Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - The writ appeals are maintainable against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions - The Division Bench has jurisdiction to interfere when the order is perverse or suffers from error of law - Held that the appeals are allowed (Paras 21-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the show-cause notice and demolition order issued by the BBMP Commissioner were valid and complied with principles of natural justice, and whether the writ court erred in dismissing the petitions challenging the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Division Bench allowed the writ appeals, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.3.2016, and quashed the show-cause notice dated 24.11.2015 and demolition order dated 26.11.2015. The court directed the BBMP to issue a fresh notice after giving a proper opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • show-cause notice
  • demolition order
  • hearing opportunity
  • Section 321 Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1976
  • Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (03) 4

Writ Appeal Nos. 621-622 of 2016 (LB-BMP) and Writ Appeal Nos.802-804 of 2016 (LB-BMP), Writ Appeal No.789 of 2016 (LB-BMP) and Writ Appeal Nos.812-815 of 2016 (LB-BMP)

2017-03-14

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, Chief Justice, Budihal R.B., Justice

Sri D.L.N.Rao, Senior Counsel a/w Sri Deshraj, Advocate for appellants in WA 621-622/2016 and 802-804/2016; Sri Ananth Mandai, Senior Counsel a/w Sri Sreenivasa Patavardhan K R, Advocate for appellant in WA 789/2016 and 812-815/2016; Sri V.Sreenidhi, AGA for R-1 & R-2; Sri K.N.Phanindra, Advocate for R-3 to R-7

Sri Shantesh Gureddi, Smt. Jyothi Gureddi, M/s Roerich Hotels Pvt Ltd

The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagar Palike, The Assistant Executive Engineer, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagar Palike, Citizens Forum for Safe Environment, Mr. Jagdish K. Bihani, Mr. Bharat M. Mehta, Mr. Mandeep Singh Chandok, Mr. Ashwin Shah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals against dismissal of writ petitions challenging show-cause notice and demolition order issued by BBMP Commissioner regarding alleged unauthorized constructions.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the show-cause notice dated 24.11.2015 and demolition order dated 26.11.2015, and quashing of the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing their writ petitions.

Filing Reason

The BBMP Commissioner issued a show-cause notice and demolition order without proper hearing and without specifying the unauthorized portions, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 31080/2015 & 31202-205/2015) on 16.3.2016, upholding the demolition order.

Issues

Whether the show-cause notice and demolition order violated principles of natural justice? Whether the Commissioner failed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing under Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976? Whether the writ court erred in dismissing the petitions?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the show-cause notice was vague, did not specify the unauthorized portions, and no proper hearing was given before the demolition order. Respondents argued that the constructions were illegal and caused public nuisance, and the demolition order was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The power under Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 to order demolition must be exercised after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The show-cause notice must specify the exact unauthorized portions, and the demolition order must be based on proper application of mind. Failure to comply with natural justice renders the order invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The show-cause notice was issued on 24.11.2015 calling for objections within 24 hours and the demolition order was passed on 26.11.2015 without considering the objections. The Commissioner failed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing, which is mandatory under Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

Procedural History

The BBMP issued show-cause notice on 24.11.2015 and demolition order on 26.11.2015. The appellants filed writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 31080/2015 & 31202-205/2015) which were dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 16.3.2016. The appellants then filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, which were heard and allowed by the Division Bench on 14.3.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976: Section 321
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition of Building in Cunningham Cross Road, Holding That Show-Cause Notice and Demolition Order Were Invalid for Non-Compliance With Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Hearing Under Karnataka Municipal...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Not Proved as Required Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that an application under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment based on assignment...