High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions of University Librarians Seeking Retirement at 62 Years. Librarians Held to be Non-Teaching Staff Bound by Government Order Fixing Superannuation at 60 Years Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by University Librarians challenging the State Government's order dated 28/09/2015 which fixed the age of superannuation for non-teaching staff at 60 years. The petitioners sought to continue in service until the age of 62 years, claiming parity with teaching faculty. The Court examined the nature of the petitioners' employment and the binding effect of the Government order. It held that Librarians are non-teaching staff and are not entitled to the same retirement age as teaching faculty. The Court dismissed the petitions, upholding the Government order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Age of Superannuation - Non-Teaching Staff - University Librarians - The petitioners, working as Librarians in various universities, challenged the State Government's order dated 28/09/2015 fixing the age of superannuation at 60 years for non-teaching staff, seeking parity with teaching faculty who retire at 62 years. The Court held that Librarians are non-teaching staff and are bound by the Government order, and that there is no right to claim parity with teaching faculty as they belong to a different class. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Government Order - Binding Nature - Universities - The Court held that the State Government's order fixing the age of superannuation for non-teaching staff is binding on all universities in the State, and the universities cannot deviate from it. The petitioners' claim for retirement at 62 years was rejected. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether University Librarians, who are non-teaching staff, are entitled to continue in service until the age of 62 years on par with teaching faculty, or whether they are bound by the State Government's order fixing the age of superannuation at 60 years for non-teaching staff.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petitions dismissed. The Court upheld the State Government's order dated 28/09/2015 fixing the age of superannuation at 60 years for non-teaching staff, including University Librarians. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Age of superannuation
  • Non-teaching staff
  • University Librarians
  • Parity with teaching faculty
  • Government order binding on universities
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (11) 10

Writ Petition No.13051/2016 (S-R) c/w Writ Petition Nos.33239/2016 & 51521/2016 (S-RES)

2018-11-23

Justice Krishna S Dixit

Sri. M. Nagaprasanna (Senior Advocate) for petitioners, Smt. Suvarna M.L. for petitioners, Sri. Nitin Ramesh (AGA) for State, Sri. Santhosh S. Nagarale for R1 in WP13051/2016, Sri. M. Keshava Reddy for R1 in WP33239/2016

H.J.Poornachandra, Dr. M. Anjanappa, Dr. M.K. Bhandi

Davangere University, Bangalore University, Mangalore University, State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the State Government's order fixing age of superannuation for non-teaching staff at 60 years.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the Government order dated 28/09/2015 and communication dated 08/06/2016, and direction to continue services until age 62 years.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, working as Librarians in universities, were sought to be retired at age 60 as per Government order, whereas they claimed entitlement to retire at 62 years like teaching faculty.

Issues

Whether University Librarians are teaching or non-teaching staff for the purpose of age of superannuation. Whether the State Government's order fixing retirement age at 60 for non-teaching staff is binding on universities. Whether petitioners are entitled to parity with teaching faculty.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that Librarians are academic staff and should be treated at par with teaching faculty for retirement age. Respondents contended that Librarians are non-teaching staff and bound by the Government order.

Ratio Decidendi

University Librarians are non-teaching staff and are bound by the State Government's order fixing the age of superannuation at 60 years. There is no right to claim parity with teaching faculty as they belong to a different class. The Government order is binding on all universities in the State.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are working as Librarians in various Universities. They are non-teaching staff. The State Government has issued an order fixing the age of superannuation at 60 years for non-teaching staff. The petitioners cannot claim parity with teaching faculty as they belong to a different class.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2016 challenging the Government order dated 28/09/2015 and subsequent communications. They were heard together and disposed of by a common order on 23/11/2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Court Holds That Non-Compoundable Offences Can Be Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC if Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary, and Continuation of Proce...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions of University Librarians Seeking Retirement at 62 Years. Librarians Held to be Non-Teaching Staff Bound by Government Order Fixing Superannuation at 60 Years Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.