High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of Bank Employee Challenging Dismissal Without Prior Approval Under Regulation 4(1) of Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. Dismissal Set Aside as Void Ab Initio, Petitioner Deemed Voluntarily Retired Entitled to Ex-Gratia and Pension.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S M Adiga, was an officer in senior management grade scale-V at Syndicate Bank. He was dismissed from service by an order dated 03.10.2001. The petitioner challenged the dismissal and sought payment of balance 50% ex-gratia amount and arrears of pension. The court found that the disciplinary authority had not obtained prior approval from the Central Government as required under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, rendering the dismissal void ab initio. Consequently, the petitioner was deemed to have voluntarily retired on the date of dismissal. The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the dismissal order, and directed the bank to pay the balance ex-gratia amount and arrears of pension with interest at 6% per annum.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Disciplinary Proceedings - Dismissal Without Prior Approval - Regulation 4(1) of Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 - The disciplinary authority imposed the penalty of dismissal from service without obtaining prior approval from the Central Government as mandated by Regulation 4(1). The court held that such dismissal is void ab initio and the petitioner is deemed to have retired voluntarily on the date of dismissal, entitling him to all consequential benefits including ex-gratia and pension. (Paras 2-10)

B) Service Law - Ex-Gratia Payment - Entitlement - The petitioner was denied 50% of ex-gratia amount on the ground of dismissal. Since the dismissal was held invalid, the court directed the bank to pay the balance 50% of ex-gratia with interest at 6% per annum from the date it became due. (Paras 11-15)

C) Service Law - Pensionary Benefits - Arrears of Pension - The court directed the bank to compute and pay arrears of pension from the date of dismissal (deemed voluntary retirement) with interest at 6% per annum, as the dismissal was set aside. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the disciplinary authority could impose the penalty of dismissal from service without obtaining prior approval from the Central Government as required under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, and whether the petitioner is entitled to ex-gratia payment and pensionary benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed both writ petitions, quashed the dismissal order dated 03.10.2001, and directed the bank to treat the petitioner as having voluntarily retired on that date. The bank was directed to pay the balance 50% ex-gratia amount of Rs.7,57,355/- with interest at 6% per annum from 01.10.2001 until payment, and to compute and pay arrears of pension with interest at 6% per annum from the due dates.

Law Points

  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Dismissal without prior approval
  • Regulation 4(1) of Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations
  • 1976
  • Ex-gratia payment
  • Pensionary benefits
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (07) 71

W.P.No.18992/2003 (S-DE) and W.P.No.40590/2003 (S-R)

2018-07-09

A S Bopanna

P S Rajagopal (Senior Counsel for M N Prasanna, Adv.) for petitioner, K Radhesh Prabhu for respondent

S M Adiga

Syndicate Bank

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging dismissal order and seeking payment of ex-gratia and pension arrears.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of dismissal order dated 03.10.2001, and direction to bank to pay balance 50% ex-gratia amount of Rs.7,57,355/- with interest at 18% per annum, and arrears of pension with interest.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was dismissed from service without prior approval as required under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976, and was denied ex-gratia and pension benefits.

Previous Decisions

The writ petitions were earlier disposed of by order dated 20.10.2008, but subsequently revived.

Issues

Whether the dismissal order was valid without prior approval under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. Whether the petitioner is entitled to balance 50% ex-gratia amount and arrears of pension.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the dismissal was void ab initio for want of prior approval under Regulation 4(1). Respondent bank contended that the dismissal was valid and the petitioner was not entitled to ex-gratia or pension.

Ratio Decidendi

The disciplinary authority cannot impose the penalty of dismissal without obtaining prior approval from the Central Government as required under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. Such dismissal is void ab initio, and the employee is deemed to have voluntarily retired, entitling him to all consequential benefits including ex-gratia and pension.

Judgment Excerpts

The disciplinary authority could not have imposed the penalty of dismissal without obtaining prior approval from the Central Government as required under Regulation 4(1) of the Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. The dismissal order is void ab initio and the petitioner is deemed to have voluntarily retired on the date of dismissal.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.18992/2003 challenging the dismissal order dated 03.10.2001 and seeking ex-gratia payment. W.P.No.40590/2003 was filed seeking pension arrears. Both petitions were initially disposed of on 20.10.2008 but were subsequently revived and heard together, with judgment pronounced on 09.07.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976: Regulation 4(1)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of Bank Employee Challenging Dismissal Without Prior Approval Under Regulation 4(1) of Syndicate Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. Dismissal Set Aside as Void Ab Initio, P...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Sugar Factory's Right to Export Subsidy Under Sugar Development Fund Act, 1982. Internal transport and freight charges subsidy cannot be denied on ground of non-compliance with procedural requirements where substantive...