High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the Tribunal's order did not give rise to any substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 and Income Tax Officer) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Bengaluru, dated 10.01.2017 in ITA No.1282/Bang/2013 for Assessment Year 2009-2010. The appeal was filed by the Revenue raising a suggested substantial question of law: whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The High Court of Karnataka, consisting of Dr. Vineet Kothari and Mrs. S. Sujatha, heard the appeal. The court considered the submissions of the appellant's counsel, Mr. Sanmathi E.I., and the respondent's counsel, Mr. A. Shankar and M. Lava. The court found that no substantial question of law arises from the Tribunal's order and accordingly dismissed the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 02.07.2018.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Appeal under Section 260A - Substantial Question of Law - The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that no substantial question of law arises from the Tribunal's order and dismissed the appeal. (Para 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer on the facts and circumstances of the case?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed as no substantial question of law arises.

Law Points

  • Substantial question of law
  • Section 260A Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Appeal against Tribunal order
  • No substantial question of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (07) 9

I.T.A.No.451/2017

2018-07-02

Dr. Vineet Kothari, Mrs. S. Sujatha

Mr. Sanmathi E.I. (for appellant), Mr. A. Shankar and Sri M. Lava (for respondent)

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Bengaluru & Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(3), Bengaluru

Shri V. Ramaiah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside the appellate order of ITAT and decide the question of law

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by ITAT order deleting addition made by Assessing Officer

Previous Decisions

ITAT order dated 10.01.2017 in ITA No.1282/Bang/2013 for Assessment Year 2009-2010

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in deleting the addition. Respondent supported the Tribunal's order.

Ratio Decidendi

No substantial question of law arises from the Tribunal's order, hence appeal under Section 260A is not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Revenue has filed this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 raising following suggested substantial question of law... No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.

Procedural History

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Bengaluru, dated 10.01.2017 in ITA No.1282/Bang/2013 for Assessment Year 2009-2010. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 02.07.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Vodafone TDS Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of TDS on...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the Tribunal's order did not give rise to any substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1...