Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in Murder Case Citing Parity with Co-Accused and Completion of Investigation. Petitioner, accused No.4, granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on ground of parity after co-accused (accused No.7) was enlarged on bail, despite earlier dismissal of his first bail petition.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Manjunatha Y V @ Thamma Manja, filed a second bail petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.247/2017 registered by Thalaghattapura Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner was arrayed as accused No.4 in the charge-sheet, which had been filed against nine accused persons. His earlier bail petition (Criminal Petition No.664/2018) was dismissed by a considered order dated 21.02.2018. However, subsequent to that dismissal, the same court granted bail to accused No.7 in the same crime. The petitioner therefore filed the present petition primarily on the ground of parity, arguing that his case was similar to that of accused No.7. The State opposed the petition, but the court noted that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet had been filed. Considering the fact that a co-accused similarly situated had been granted bail, the court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail on the principle of parity. The court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to be released on bail subject to conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties, appearing before the court as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Parity - Subsequent to dismissal of earlier bail petition, co-accused (accused No.7) was granted bail by the same court - Petitioner, accused No.4, sought bail on ground of parity - Held that where charge-sheet has been filed and co-accused similarly placed has been granted bail, petitioner is entitled to bail on parity, subject to conditions (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused No.4, is entitled to bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.247/2017 for offences under Sections 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302 read with 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail in Crime No.247/2017 (C.C.No.9886/2017) of Thalaghattapura Police Station, subject to executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the trial court. The petitioner shall appear before the court as and when required, shall not tamper with evidence, and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Section 439 Cr.P.C.
  • Parity
  • Charge-sheet filed
  • No criminal antecedents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (06) 5

Criminal Petition No.1515 of 2018

2018-06-12

John Michael Cunha

Manjunath G (for petitioner), K. Nageshwarappa (HCGP for respondent)

Manjunatha Y V @ Thamma Manja

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of petitioner on bail in Crime No.247/2017

Filing Reason

Petitioner is accused No.4 in a case involving murder and other offences; his earlier bail petition was dismissed, but co-accused No.7 was subsequently granted bail, prompting this second petition on parity.

Previous Decisions

Earlier bail petition (Criminal Petition No.664/2018) was dismissed on 21.02.2018. Subsequently, accused No.7 was granted bail by the same court.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who has been granted bail? Whether the completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet is a relevant factor for granting bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is similarly placed as accused No.7, who has been granted bail, and therefore he is entitled to bail on parity. State opposed the petition, but the court considered that charge-sheet has been filed and co-accused has been granted bail.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a co-accused similarly situated has been granted bail and the investigation is complete with charge-sheet filed, the principle of parity entitles the petitioner to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

This is the second petition filed under section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.247/2017 for the offences punishable under sections 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302 read with section 149 of Indian Penal Code. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet is laid against nine accused persons. The petitioner is shown as accused No.4. Subsequent to the dismissal of the said petition, this court enlarged accused No.7 on bail.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a first bail petition (Criminal Petition No.664/2018) which was dismissed on 21.02.2018. Thereafter, accused No.7 was granted bail by the same court. The petitioner then filed the present second bail petition (Criminal Petition No.1515/2018) on the ground of parity. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 05.06.2018 and pronounced on 12.06.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302, 149
  • Arms Act, 1959: 25, 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in Murder Case Citing Parity with Co-Accused and Completion of Investigation. Petitioner, accused No.4, granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on ground of parity after co-accused (accused No.7) was en...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest in Criminal Complaint for Breach of Trust — Petitioner Alleged No Role in Son's Business. Court Held That Interim Protection from Arrest Is Necessary to Prevent Irreparable Harm While Petition...