High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition by BSNL in Recovery Suit — Limitation Period Extended by Acknowledgment of Debt. Letter dated 25.02.2000 from respondent acknowledging telephone bill dues and requesting installment payment constitutes valid acknowledgment under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving suit from bar of limitation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The revision petition was filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), a Government Company under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2006 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hubballi, in Small Cause Suit No.98/2003, whereby the suit for recovery of money was dismissed on the sole ground of limitation. The brief facts are that BSNL had provided telephone connection to the respondent, who failed to pay the bill amount of Rs. 3,000/-. The respondent sent a letter dated 25.02.2000 acknowledging the debt and requesting to pay the amount in installments. BSNL filed the suit on 24.04.2003. The trial court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, holding that the cause of action arose in 1998 and the suit was filed beyond three years. The legal issue was whether the respondent's letter constituted an acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, thereby extending the limitation period. The petitioner argued that the letter dated 25.02.2000 was an acknowledgment and the suit was within time. The respondent, though served, remained absent, and the court appointed an amicus curiae. The court analyzed that under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, an acknowledgment of liability in writing before the expiration of the limitation period extends the period of limitation. The respondent's letter clearly acknowledged the debt and requested installment payment, which was an unequivocal acknowledgment. The suit filed on 24.04.2003 was within three years from the date of acknowledgment. The court allowed the revision petition, set aside the trial court's judgment, and decreed the suit for Rs. 3,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act - Acknowledgment of Debt - Section 18 - Extension of Limitation - The suit for recovery of telephone bill dues was dismissed by the trial court on the ground of limitation. The High Court held that the respondent's letter dated 25.02.2000 acknowledging the debt and requesting installment payment constituted an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, thereby extending the limitation period. The suit filed on 24.04.2003 was within time. (Paras 3-5)

B) Companies Act - Government Company - Section 617 - BSNL is a Government Company under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, and is entitled to the benefit of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. (Para 2)

C) Civil Procedure - Small Cause Suit - Revision under Section 18 of Small Cause Courts Act - The revision petition was allowed, setting aside the trial court's judgment and decree, and the suit was decreed in favor of BSNL for recovery of Rs. 3,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit filed by BSNL for recovery of telephone bill dues was barred by limitation, and whether an acknowledgment of debt by the respondent extended the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Revision petition allowed. Judgment and decree dated 27.06.2006 passed in S.C.No.98/2003 by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hubballi, is set aside. Suit is decreed in favor of the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 3,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • Section 18
  • acknowledgment of debt
  • extension of limitation period
  • government company
  • Section 617 Companies Act
  • 1956
  • Small Cause Suit
  • recovery of money
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (03) 13

CRP No.250/2007

2018-03-09

Krishna S. Dixit

Sri. M.B. Kanavi (CGSC) for petitioner, Sri. Girish Yadawad (Amicus Curiae) for respondent

The Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Reptd. by its General Manager, Telecom District, Dharwad, by its Senior Accounts Officer (TRA) Telecom Hubli - 580028

Sri Ahmed Sharief Abdul Gaffar Kamanagar, Age Major, Occupation: Business, Resident of Patil Galli, Veerapur Oni, Hubli – 580028

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision petition against dismissal of small cause suit for recovery of money on ground of limitation

Remedy Sought

BSNL sought recovery of Rs. 3,000/- from respondent for unpaid telephone bill dues

Filing Reason

Respondent failed to pay telephone bill amount despite acknowledgment of debt and request for installment payment

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed suit as barred by limitation on 27.06.2006

Issues

Whether the suit filed by BSNL for recovery of telephone bill dues was barred by limitation Whether the respondent's letter dated 25.02.2000 constituted an acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending the limitation period

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondent's letter dated 25.02.2000 was an acknowledgment of debt and the suit filed on 24.04.2003 was within limitation Respondent remained absent; amicus curiae argued on behalf of respondent

Ratio Decidendi

An acknowledgment of liability in writing before the expiration of the limitation period extends the period of limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The respondent's letter dated 25.02.2000 acknowledging the debt and requesting installment payment constitutes a valid acknowledgment, and the suit filed on 24.04.2003 is within time.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent had sent a letter dated 25.02.2000 acknowledging the debt and requesting to pay the amount in installments. The suit filed on 24.04.2003 is within three years from the date of acknowledgment. The acknowledgment of liability in writing before the expiration of the limitation period extends the period of limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Procedural History

BSNL filed Small Cause Suit No.98/2003 before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hubballi, for recovery of Rs. 3,000/-. The trial court dismissed the suit on 27.06.2006 on the ground of limitation. BSNL filed Civil Revision Petition No.250/2007 under Section 18 of the Small Cause Courts Act before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, which allowed the revision on 09.03.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: 18
  • Companies Act, 1956: 617
  • Small Cause Courts Act: 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigating Acts. Death Note Allegations Insufficient to Sustain Section 306 IPC Charge Without Evidence of Direct or Indirect Instigation.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House Licence for Lack of Personal Liability — Licencee Not Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employees Without Prior Knowledge or Consent Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the licencee c...