High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Demolition of Convention Hall in Town Planning Case — Notice Under Section 14(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) and Natural Justice. The court quashed the notice issued by the planning authority for removal of a convention hall as it was issued without prior show cause notice and opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Krishnegowda, proprietor of M/s Neelakanta Convention Center, challenged a notice dated 13.05.2015 issued by the respondent, Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority, under Section 14(2) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, calling upon him to remove a Convention Hall. The appellant filed writ petitions which were dismissed by a learned Single Judge on 23.06.2015. Aggrieved, the appellant filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The core legal issue was whether the notice under Section 14(2) could be issued without a prior notice under Section 14(1) and without affording an opportunity of hearing. The appellant argued that the notice was invalid as it did not comply with the mandatory procedure under Section 14(1) and principles of natural justice. The respondent contended that the notice was valid and the appellant had no right to continue the unauthorized construction. The court, after hearing both sides, held that Section 14(2) is a follow-up provision to Section 14(1) and cannot be invoked independently. The planning authority must first issue a notice under Section 14(1) calling upon the person to show cause and provide an opportunity of hearing. Since the impugned notice was issued without complying with Section 14(1) and without affording any opportunity, it was invalid. The court allowed the appeals, set aside the order of the Single Judge, and quashed the notice dated 13.05.2015, granting liberty to the respondent to proceed in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Notice under Section 14(2) - Validity - Section 14(1) and 14(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - The court considered whether a notice under Section 14(2) can be issued without a prior notice under Section 14(1) and without affording an opportunity of hearing. Held that Section 14(2) notice is a follow-up to Section 14(1) and cannot be issued independently without complying with Section 14(1) and principles of natural justice. (Paras 1-10)

B) Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Section 14 of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - The court held that before issuing a notice under Section 14(2) for removal of unauthorized construction, the planning authority must first issue a notice under Section 14(1) calling upon the person to show cause and provide an opportunity of hearing. Failure to do so renders the notice invalid. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice issued under Section 14(2) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, without prior notice under Section 14(1) and without affording opportunity of hearing, is valid?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeals are allowed. The order dated 23.06.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.22825/2015 and connected cases is set aside. The notice dated 13.05.2015 issued by the respondent is quashed. The respondent is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 14(1) and Section 14(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act
  • 1961
  • Natural Justice
  • Notice
  • Demolition
  • Planning Authority
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (03) 1

WA No.2218/2015 & WAs No.2226-2227/2015

2018-03-02

H.G.Ramesh, P.S.Dinesh Kumar

R.Nataraj, Yogesh Naik, S.G.Pandit

Krishnegowda

M/s Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals challenging dismissal of writ petitions against a notice under Section 14(2) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 for removal of a convention hall.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the order of the Single Judge and quash the notice dated 13.05.2015.

Filing Reason

The respondent issued a notice under Section 14(2) of the Act calling upon the appellant to remove a convention hall without prior notice under Section 14(1) and without affording an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed Writ Petition No.22825/2015 and connected cases on 23.06.2015.

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 14(2) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 is valid without prior notice under Section 14(1) and without affording opportunity of hearing?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the notice under Section 14(2) is invalid as it was issued without complying with Section 14(1) and principles of natural justice. Respondent argued that the notice was valid and the appellant had no right to continue unauthorized construction.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 14(2) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 is a follow-up provision to Section 14(1). A notice under Section 14(2) cannot be issued without first issuing a notice under Section 14(1) and affording an opportunity of hearing. Non-compliance with Section 14(1) and principles of natural justice renders the notice invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

These writ appeals are filed challenging order dated 23.06.2015 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge, dismissing Writ Petition No.22825/2015 and connected cases. Brief facts of the case are, respondent, M/s.Bengaluru Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority (‘Planning Authority’ for short) issued a notice dated 13.05.2015, under the provisions of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short), calling upon petitioner to remove a ‘Convention Hall’

Procedural History

The respondent issued a notice dated 13.05.2015 under Section 14(2) of the Act. The appellant filed Writ Petition No.22825/2015 and connected cases challenging the notice. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petitions on 23.06.2015. Aggrieved, the appellant filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The appeals were heard and reserved for judgment on 09.01.2018 and pronounced on 02.03.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961: 14(1), 14(2)
  • Karnataka High Court Act: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings on Limitation in Eviction Suit. Court holds that a suit for possession filed within 12 years of the date when possession becomes adverse is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Demolition of Convention Hall in Town Planning Case — Notice Under Section 14(2) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) and Natural Justice. ...