High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute Case Following Settlement Between Accused and Complainant. Court Permits Compounding of Offences Under Section 482 CrPC, Holding Continuation of Proceedings Would Be Abuse of Process.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were accused No.1, 3 to 6 in S.C.No.295/2018 pending before the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking to quash the entire proceedings. The ground for the petition was that the complainant (respondent No.2) and the accused had settled their dispute amicably, and the complainant was no longer interested in prosecuting the case. The brief facts of the case are that the first informant is the brother-in-law of accused No.1, as the sister of accused No.1 was married to the first informant. There was a dispute regarding house property No.5-530, and on 03.06.2016 at about 09.45 p.m., an incident occurred leading to the registration of Crime No.38/2016 at Roza Police Station. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the first informant/respondent No.2, and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State. After considering the submissions and the fact that the parties had settled the dispute, the court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in S.C.No.295/2018, holding that continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the court.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 CrPC - Compounding of Offences - The petitioners (accused) sought quashing of proceedings in S.C.No.295/2018 on the ground of settlement with the complainant. The dispute arose from a family property issue between brother-in-law and accused. The court, after hearing parties and noting the settlement, allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings. Held that when parties have settled the dispute, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of court. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings in S.C.No.295/2018 can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the ground that the complainant and accused have settled their dispute amicably.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in S.C.No.295/2018 pending on the file of Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, in Crime No.38/2016 of Roza Police Station are quashed.

Law Points

  • Compounding of non-compoundable offences
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • quashing of criminal proceedings on settlement
  • inherent powers of High Court
  • matrimonial and property disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (11) 57

Criminal Petition No.201168/2019

2019-11-25

Mohammad Nawaz

Shivasharan Reddy, Ustad Sadath Hussain, Mallikarjun Sahukar, Idrees Jagirdar

Majeed @ Majeed Khan, Mahammed Noor @ Noor, Mahammed Gouse @ Gouse, Mohammed Khadar, Shaik Iqbal

The State of Karnataka, Abdul Hameed

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings in a sessions case on ground of settlement.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (accused) sought permission to compound the offence and quash the entire proceedings in S.C.No.295/2018.

Filing Reason

The petitioners and complainant settled their dispute and complainant was not interested in prosecuting the case.

Previous Decisions

The case was pending as S.C.No.295/2018 before the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, arising from Crime No.38/2016 of Roza Police Station.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the parties have settled the dispute.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the dispute has been settled amicably and complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Complainant/respondent No.2 agreed to the settlement. State/respondent No.1 did not oppose the quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the court, and hence the proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed seeking to quash the entire proceedings on the ground that complainant and accused have settled their dispute and complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the petition is allowed.

Procedural History

The petitioners (accused No.1, 3 to 6) filed Criminal Petition No.201168/2019 under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, seeking quashing of S.C.No.295/2018 pending before the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, which arose from Crime No.38/2016 of Roza Police Station. The court heard the parties and allowed the petition on 25.11.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case — Notification 8/2005-ST Held Conditional. CESTAT order setting aside demand against assessee upheld as notification required fulfillment of conditions for exemption.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Summons to Honorary Consul. Immunity under Vienna Convention on Consular Relations not available to Honorary Consul for acts outside consular functions.