High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in SC/ST Land Restoration Case — Grant Condition Prohibiting Alienation Forever Not Void. The Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 applies to grants made before its commencement if the grant contained a condition prohibiting alienation forever.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant and the sixth respondent, claiming to be legal representatives of the original grantee Thimmappa @ Thimmaiah, filed proceedings under Sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (PTCL Act) for restoration of land measuring 4 acres 9 guntas in Hosahalli village. The land was granted to Thimmappa on 24 September 1941 with a condition that he shall not alienate the land forever. Despite this condition, the grantee sold the land in 1966 and 1972, and subsequently it was sold to the third to fifth respondents in 2005. The appellant and sixth respondent filed an application in 2007 before the Assistant Commissioner seeking restoration. The Assistant Commissioner allowed the application, but the District Commissioner set aside that order. The appellant then filed a writ petition before the High Court, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 14 August 2019. The present appeal challenges that dismissal. The Division Bench considered whether the PTCL Act applies to grants made before its commencement (1978) and whether the condition prohibiting alienation forever is valid. The court held that the Act applies to such grants and the condition is valid. The court also held that the alienations made in 1966 and 1972 are void and the land is liable to be restored. The court set aside the impugned order of the learned Single Judge and allowed the writ petition, directing the Assistant Commissioner to restore the land to the appellant and the sixth respondent.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Land Restoration - Sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Applicability to Pre-Act Grants - The Act applies to grants made before its commencement if the grant contained a condition prohibiting alienation forever. The court held that the condition 'shall not alienate the land forever' is a valid condition and the Act applies to such grants. (Paras 1-10)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Void Alienation - Restoration - Sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Alienations made in 1966 and 1972 in violation of the condition prohibiting alienation forever are void. The court held that the subsequent purchasers do not acquire any title, and the land is liable to be restored to the legal representatives of the original grantee. (Paras 2-10)

C) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Limitation - Sections 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - No limitation period for seeking restoration under the Act. The court held that the Act does not prescribe any limitation for filing an application for restoration, and the delay in filing the application in 2007 does not bar the claim. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 applies to a grant made in 1941 with a condition prohibiting alienation forever, and whether the subsequent alienations are void and liable to be restored.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 14.08.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.31117/2019 is set aside. The writ petition is allowed. The Assistant Commissioner is directed to restore the schedule property to the appellant and the sixth respondent in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act
  • 1978
  • Sections 4 and 5
  • applicability to pre-Act grants
  • condition prohibiting alienation forever
  • void alienation
  • restoration of land
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (11) 2

Writ Appeal No.3855 of 2019 (SC-ST)

2019-11-06

Abhay S. Oka, Chief Justice, S.R. Krishna Kumar, J.

Shri. B.N. Suresh Babu for appellant; Shri Vikaram Huilgol, HCGP for R-1 & R-2; Shri B. Chethan for R-3 to R-5

Sri. Narayanaswamy

The District Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District; The Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru North Sub-Division; Sri. K.M.Naveen; Sri. Ramanna; Sri. Munivenkataswamy; Smt. Sakamma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of writ petition seeking restoration of land under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought setting aside of the order dated 12.08.2019 passed in W.P.No.31117/2019 and allowance of the writ petition for restoration of the schedule property.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed that the schedule property was granted to Thimmappa @ Thimmaiah, a SC/ST person, on 24.09.1941 with a condition prohibiting alienation forever, and that subsequent alienations were void under the PTCL Act.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Commissioner allowed the restoration application; the District Commissioner set aside that order; the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition.

Issues

Whether the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 applies to a grant made in 1941 with a condition prohibiting alienation forever. Whether the alienations made in 1966 and 1972 are void and liable to be restored.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the grant contained a condition prohibiting alienation forever, and the PTCL Act applies to such grants, making the subsequent alienations void. The respondents argued that the PTCL Act does not apply to grants made before its commencement, and the condition was not valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 applies to grants made before its commencement if the grant contained a condition prohibiting alienation forever. Such a condition is valid, and alienations made in violation of it are void and liable to be restored.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal takes exception to the impugned judgment and order dated 14th August 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.31117/2019, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant and the sixth respondent has been dismissed. The appellant and the sixth respondent claiming to be the legal representatives of the original grantee initiated the proceedings under Section 4 and 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 for restoration of the land bearing Sy.No.151 measuring 4 acres 9 guntas situated at Hosahalli village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North taluk.

Procedural History

The appellant and sixth respondent filed an application under Sections 4 and 5 of the PTCL Act in 2007 before the Assistant Commissioner for restoration of land. The Assistant Commissioner allowed the application. The District Commissioner set aside that order on appeal. The appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 14.08.2019. The present appeal was filed against that dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978: 4, 5
  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Classification Dispute. Rental Income from Property Held as Stock-in-Trade is Business Income, Not Income from House Property Under Section 22 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process. The Court held that the BDA's admission of unauthorize...