High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Based on Parity with Co-Accused Who Were Already Enlarged on Bail. Petitioners-accused entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as co-accused in same crime had been granted bail by coordinate benches.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused nos. 1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No. 115/2015 registered at Hubli Town Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case was pending as S.C. No. 65/2019 before the I Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at Hubli. The petitioners had been in judicial custody since their arrest. The factual matrix of the case is that on 09.10.2018 at around 10 p.m., the complainant Altaf Ahmad Kanavi and others were present when the accused persons allegedly assaulted Imtiyaz Kanavi with weapons, resulting in his death. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to bail on the ground of parity, as co-accused in the same crime had already been granted bail by coordinate benches of the High Court in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ravi B. Naik, placed these orders before the court. The court considered the submissions and held that since the co-accused had been enlarged on bail, the petitioners, who were similarly situated, were entitled to bail on the ground of parity. The court allowed the petition and directed that the petitioners be released on bail subject to certain conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety, appearing before the court regularly, and not tampering with prosecution witnesses.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Parity - Petitioners-accused sought bail in a murder case where co-accused had already been enlarged on bail by coordinate benches of the same court - Held that the petitioners are entitled to bail on the ground of parity, as the case of the petitioners is similar to that of the co-accused who were granted bail (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners-accused are entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in a murder case where co-accused have already been granted bail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioners-accused nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety, subject to conditions including appearing before the court regularly and not tampering with witnesses.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Parity
  • Section 439 Cr.P.C.
  • Murder
  • Unlawful Assembly
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (09) 42

CRL. P. NO. 101723/2019

2019-09-20

K. Somashekar

Ravi B. Naik (Senior Counsel for petitioners), Avinash M. Angadi (Advocate for petitioners), Raja Raghavendra Naik (Government Pleader for respondent)

Davood Nadaf and Sharoq Bepari

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of petitioners-accused on regular bail

Filing Reason

Petitioners were in judicial custody and sought bail on grounds of parity with co-accused who had been granted bail

Previous Decisions

Co-accused were enlarged on bail by coordinate benches in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Senior Counsel for petitioners argued that co-accused have been granted bail by coordinate benches, and petitioners are similarly situated, hence entitled to bail on parity.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of parity applies in bail matters; if co-accused similarly situated have been granted bail, the petitioners are entitled to bail on the same ground.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition filed by the accused nos.1 and 2 u/S 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge them on bail in S.C. No. 65/2019 arose in Hubballi Town Police Station Crime No. 115/2015 registered for the offences punishable u/s 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302 r/w Sec. 149 of IPC. The learned Senior Counsel, namely, Sri Ravi B. Naik, has placed the orders passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and in Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019, wherein the co-accused are enlarged on bail.

Procedural History

The petitioners were arrested in Crime No. 115/2015 and were in judicial custody. They filed a bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. before the High Court. The petition was heard and disposed of on 20.09.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Based on Parity with Co-Accused Who Were Previously Enlarged on Bail. The court allowed the bail petition under Section 439 CrPC for accused nos.1 and 2 in a case under Sections 143, 147, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing...