High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Based on Parity with Co-Accused Who Were Previously Enlarged on Bail. The court allowed the bail petition under Section 439 CrPC for accused nos.1 and 2 in a case under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302 read with 149 IPC, relying on the principle of parity with co-accused who had already been granted bail.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Davood Nadaf and Sharoq Bepari, accused nos.1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No. 115/2015 registered at Hubli Town Police Station, which led to S.C. No. 65/2019 pending before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at Hubli. The offences alleged included Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The factual matrix, as per the complaint, was that on 09.10.2018 at around 10 p.m., the complainant Altaf Ahmad Kanavi and others were present when the accused persons allegedly assaulted Imtiyaz Kanavi with weapons, resulting in his death. The petitioners had been in judicial custody since their arrest. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ravi B. Naik, placed before the court orders passed by coordinate benches of the same High Court in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019, wherein other co-accused in the same crime had been enlarged on bail. The court noted that the present petition was not a successive bail petition but a fresh one. The court, considering the principle of parity and the fact that the co-accuded had already been granted bail, allowed the petition and directed that the petitioners be released on bail on such terms as the trial court may impose. The court did not elaborate on the merits of the case but relied on the earlier orders granting bail to co-accused.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Parity - The petitioners, accused nos.1 and 2, sought regular bail in a murder case under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302 read with 149 IPC. The court granted bail primarily on the ground of parity, noting that coordinate benches had already granted bail to other co-accused in the same crime. The court held that the petitioners are similarly situated and entitled to bail on the same terms. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners-accused are entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the ground of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail by coordinate benches of this Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioners-accused nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on regular bail in S.C. No. 65/2019 (Crime No. 115/2015) pending on the file of the I Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at Hubli, on such terms and conditions as the trial court may impose.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Parity
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Unlawful Assembly
  • Common Object
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (09) 41

CRL. P. NO. 101723/2019

2019-09-20

K. Somashekar

Ravi B. Naik (Senior Counsel for petitioners), Avinash M. Angadi (Advocate for petitioners), Raja Raghavendra Naik (Government Pleader for respondent)

Davood Nadaf and Sharoq Bepari

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of petitioners-accused nos.1 and 2 on regular bail

Filing Reason

Petitioners were in judicial custody and sought bail on grounds of parity with co-accused who had been granted bail

Previous Decisions

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019 granted bail to co-accused in the same crime

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail on the ground of parity with co-accused who have been granted bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Senior Counsel for petitioners argued that coordinate benches had granted bail to co-accused in the same crime, and petitioners are similarly situated.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of parity applies when co-accused in the same crime have been granted bail by coordinate benches; the petitioners, being similarly situated, are entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition filed by the accused nos.1 and 2 u/S 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge them on bail in S.C. No. 65/2019 arose in Hubballi Town Police Station Crime No. 115/2015 registered for the offences punishable u/s 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302 r/w Sec. 149 of IPC, now pending on the file of the learned I Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Dharwad, sitting at Hubballi. The learned Senior Counsel, namely, Sri Ravi B. Naik, has placed the orders passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. P. No. 100339/2019 dated 12.03.2019 and in Crl. P. No. 101121/2019 dated 17.07.2019, wherein the co-accused are enlarged on bail.

Procedural History

The petitioners were arrested in connection with Crime No. 115/2015 and were in judicial custody. They filed a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. The petition was heard and allowed on 20.09.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Based on Parity with Co-Accused Who Were Previously Enlarged on Bail. The court allowed the bail petition under Section 439 CrPC for accused nos.1 and 2 in a case under Sections 143, 147, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing...