High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Disclosure of Legal Heirs in Civil Suit. Court holds that Section 151 CPC cannot be used to compel defendants to furnish names of legal heirs of a deceased co-defendant, as the burden lies on the plaintiffs to ascertain and implead them.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 137/2006 pending before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Udupi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 15.06.2013 passed by the trial court on I.A. No. 9. The plaintiffs had filed I.A. No. 9 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking a direction to the surviving defendants to furnish the names and addresses of the legal heirs of the 4th defendant, who had died on 19.12.2011. The trial court rejected the application, leading to the present writ petition. The brief facts are that the suit was filed by the plaintiffs against seven defendants. During the pendency of the suit, the 4th defendant died. The plaintiffs, instead of taking steps to ascertain and implead the legal representatives of the deceased defendant under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC, filed an application under Section 151 CPC seeking the court's direction to the surviving defendants to provide the details of the legal heirs. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that it was not maintainable. The High Court, after hearing the petitioners' counsel, observed that the application under Section 151 CPC was misconceived. The court noted that the plaintiffs could have taken appropriate steps under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendant on record, but instead they sought to shift the burden onto the defendants. The High Court held that the inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to compel the defendants to disclose the names of the legal heirs of a deceased co-defendant. The court found no illegality or irregularity in the trial court's order and dismissed the writ petition, upholding the rejection of I.A. No. 9.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Inherent Powers of Court - Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Application for Disclosure of Legal Heirs - Plaintiffs sought direction to surviving defendants to furnish names and addresses of legal heirs of deceased co-defendant - Trial court rejected application - High Court upheld, holding that Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to compel defendants to provide such information, as it is the plaintiffs' duty to ascertain and implead legal representatives under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC - Held that the application was not maintainable and the order of the trial court did not warrant interference (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the plaintiffs' application under Section 151 CPC seeking a direction to the surviving defendants to furnish the names and addresses of the legal heirs of the deceased 4th defendant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the trial court dated 15.06.2013 rejecting I.A. No. 9.

Law Points

  • Section 151 CPC
  • inherent powers
  • cannot be used to compel defendants to disclose legal heirs of deceased co-defendant
  • burden on plaintiff to ascertain and implead legal representatives
  • Order 22 Rule 4 CPC
  • abatement of suit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 62

Writ Petition No. 6912/2014 (GM-CPC)

2019-02-14

S.N. Satyanarayana

S. Vishwajith Shetty

Smt. Veena Rao and Sri Manoranjan Shetty

Sri Peter Vincent Barnes and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging an order rejecting an application under Section 151 CPC for direction to defendants to disclose legal heirs of deceased co-defendant.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 15.06.2013 on I.A. No. 9 in O.S. No. 137/2006 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Udupi.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the plaintiffs' application seeking a direction to the surviving defendants to furnish names and addresses of legal heirs of the deceased 4th defendant.

Previous Decisions

The trial court rejected I.A. No. 9 on 15.06.2013.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the plaintiffs' application under Section 151 CPC seeking a direction to the surviving defendants to furnish the names and addresses of the legal heirs of the deceased 4th defendant.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners/plaintiffs argued that the trial court erred in rejecting I.A. No. 9 under Section 151 CPC, as the defendants were in a better position to know the legal heirs of the deceased co-defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The inherent powers of the court under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to compel the defendants to disclose the names and addresses of the legal heirs of a deceased co-defendant. The burden is on the plaintiffs to take steps under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC to bring the legal representatives on record.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiffs in OS.No.137/2006 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Udupi, have come up in this writ petition impugning the order dated 15.6.2013 in rejecting their application in IA.9 under Section 151 of CPC seeking direction to the surviving defendants to furnish the names and address of the legal heirs of 4th defendant, who died on 19.12.2011. The application under Section 151 of CPC is not maintainable and the same is rejected.

Procedural History

The plaintiffs filed O.S. No. 137/2006 before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Udupi. During the pendency of the suit, the 4th defendant died on 19.12.2011. The plaintiffs filed I.A. No. 9 under Section 151 CPC seeking a direction to the surviving defendants to furnish the names and addresses of the legal heirs of the deceased 4th defendant. The trial court rejected the application on 15.06.2013. The plaintiffs then filed the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 151, Order 22 Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Decision Striking Down Clarification Excluding Retired Employees from Revised ACP Scheme. The Court held that the clarification dated 1.7.2011, which sought to deny the benefit of th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Regularization of Service and Pensionary Benefits of Assistant Teacher Appointed on Temporary Basis Due to Pending Litigation. Petitioner's initial temporary appointment due to vacancy caused by termination ...