High Court of Karnataka Denies Bail to Accused in Gowri Lankesh Murder Case Under KCOCA and IPC. Petitioner failed to satisfy twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA for grant of bail in a case involving organized crime syndicate and murder.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Mohan Nayak N., accused No.11 (originally accused No.8), filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in Crime No.221/2017 registered by the Special Investigating Team (SIT) and Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru. The case pertains to the murder of journalist-activist Gowri Lankesh, who was shot dead on September 5, 2017. The offences alleged include Sections 302 (murder), 120B (criminal conspiracy), 114 (abettor present when offence committed), 118 (concealing design to commit offence) read with Section 35 (criminal act done by several persons) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC); Section 3 of the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA); and Sections 3 and 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959. The complaint was filed by Kavitha Lankesh, sister of the deceased. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no direct evidence against him, and that he had been in custody since his arrest. The State, represented by the Special Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail, contending that the petitioner was a member of an organized crime syndicate and that the twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA were not satisfied. The court, after hearing both sides, examined the materials on record, including the charge sheet and statements of witnesses. It noted that the petitioner was allegedly involved in the conspiracy and had provided logistical support. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA must be fulfilled for grant of bail, i.e., there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The court found that the petitioner failed to satisfy these conditions, as a prima facie case existed against him. Consequently, the bail petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Regular Bail - Petitioner, accused No.11, sought bail in Crime No.221/2017 for offences including murder and organized crime - Court held that the twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA must be satisfied, i.e., there must be reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail - Held that the petitioner failed to satisfy these conditions (Paras 1-10).

B) Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000 - Bail - Section 21(4) KCOCA - Twin Conditions - The court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty of the offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail - Held that the petitioner, being a member of an organized crime syndicate involved in the murder of Gowri Lankesh, did not meet these conditions (Paras 6-10).

C) Indian Penal Code - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conspiracy - Section 120B IPC - Prima Facie Case - The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a conspiracy to murder Gowri Lankesh and provided materials showing his involvement - Held that a prima facie case exists against the petitioner (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused No.11, is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under Sections 302, 120B, 114, 118 r/w 35 IPC, Section 3 of KCOCA, and Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Criminal Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is not entitled to bail.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
  • Twin conditions under Section 21(4) KCOCA
  • Prima facie case
  • Organized crime
  • Conspiracy
  • Murder
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 112

Criminal Petition No.8325/2018

2019-02-11

B.A. Patil

Sri Aruna Shyam M. for petitioner, Sri H.S. Chandramouli (SPP-I) for respondent

Sri Mohan Nayak N.

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Regular bail for accused No.11 in Crime No.221/2017

Filing Reason

Petitioner sought bail for offences including murder, conspiracy, and organized crime

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA? Whether a prima facie case exists against the petitioner for the alleged offences?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued false implication and lack of direct evidence. State opposed bail citing petitioner's membership in organized crime syndicate and failure to satisfy twin conditions under KCOCA.

Ratio Decidendi

For grant of bail under Section 21(4) of KCOCA, the court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The petitioner failed to satisfy these conditions as a prima facie case existed against him.

Judgment Excerpts

In this case, accused No.8 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. I have heard the learned counsel Sri Aruna Shyam for the petitioner and Sri H.S.Chandramouli, learned SPP-I for the respondent-State. One Mrs.Kavitha Lankesh, sister of the deceased Mrs.Gowri Lankesh filed the complaint.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.8325/2018 under Section 439 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking regular bail in Crime No.221/2017 of Rajarajeshwari Nagar P.S., Bangalore. The petition was heard and reserved on 24.01.2019, and the order was pronounced on 11.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 120B, 114, 118, 35
  • Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA): 3, 21(4)
  • Indian Arms Act, 1959: 3, 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Denies Bail to Accused in Gowri Lankesh Murder Case Under KCOCA and IPC. Petitioner failed to satisfy twin conditions under Section 21(4) of KCOCA for grant of bail in a case involving organized crime syndicate and murder.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Regularization of Contractual Employees — Interpretation of Initial Constitution under Sports Authority of India (SAI) Executive Cadre (Grade A) Staff Recruitment Rules, 2022 — Rejection of Recall Application