Bombay High Court Quashes Assistant Charity Commissioner's Order Staying Elections Under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Section 41A Cannot Be Used to Interfere with Mid-Election Process; Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Through Change Reports.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a public trust, Shree Durga Mandir Sarvajanik Devasthan Vishwasta Mandal, Nagpur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, claiming to be appointed trustees under a modified scheme, filed an application under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 before the Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur. They challenged an election notice dated 29/03/2026 proposing elections on 24/04/2026, alleging it was without lawful authority and in violation of the modified scheme. The Assistant Charity Commissioner passed an order staying the election process and appointing an interim committee to manage the trust. The petitioners, who claimed to be the President and Secretary of the trust, challenged this order by way of a writ petition. The High Court framed the issue of whether Section 41A empowers the Assistant Charity Commissioner to interfere with an ongoing election process. The court analyzed the nature of Section 41A, noting it is a preventive provision intended for urgent situations to prevent mismanagement, not to stall elections. The court held that once the election process has commenced, the Assistant Charity Commissioner cannot interfere mid-way under Section 41A. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the Assistant Charity Commissioner was directed to proceed with the application under Section 41A only in accordance with law, without interfering with the election process. The court clarified that disputes regarding the validity of elections and management must be resolved through Change Reports under Section 22 or other appropriate remedies.

Headnote

A) Charity Law - Section 41A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Scope of Power - The Assistant Charity Commissioner cannot interfere with an ongoing election process under Section 41A, which is a preventive provision meant for urgent situations to prevent mismanagement, not to stall elections. The court held that the impugned order staying elections and appointing an interim committee was without jurisdiction. (Paras 3, 8-10)

B) Charity Law - Election Disputes - Change Reports - Disputes regarding the validity of elections and management must be adjudicated through Change Reports under Section 22 of the Act or other appropriate remedies, not by invoking Section 41A mid-election. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether in a proceeding under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, the Assistant Charity Commissioner is empowered to interfere with the election process in the middle of the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 29/03/2026 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur, and directed the Assistant Charity Commissioner to proceed with the application under Section 41A only in accordance with law, without interfering with the election process.

Law Points

  • Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • 1950 is a preventive provision for urgent situations
  • not to interfere with election process mid-way
  • Assistant Charity Commissioner cannot stay elections or appoint interim committee under Section 41A when election process is already underway
  • Election disputes must be resolved through Change Reports under Section 22 or other appropriate remedies.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 252

Writ Petition No. 4116 of 2026

2026-06-10

Anil S. Kilor, Raj D. Wakode

2026:BHC-NAG:7666-DB

Mr S. D. Abhyankar for petitioners; Mr P. P. Pendke, AGP for respondent No.1/State; Ms Dipti V. Khanorkar for respondent Nos. 2 and 3; Mr A. J. Pathak for respondent Nos. 4 and 5

Shri Shyam Vasant Kale and Shri Vijay Janardhan Bhat

The Learned Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur; Shri Ramchandra Krushnarao Kelapure; Sau. Swati Chintaman Sathe; Shri Vishal Vilasrao Deshpande; Shri Shakal Prakash Shukla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Assistant Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 staying election process and appointing interim committee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the Assistant Charity Commissioner's order dated 29/03/2026 staying elections and appointing interim committee.

Filing Reason

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed application under Section 41A alleging election notice was without authority and in violation of modified scheme; Assistant Charity Commissioner passed order staying elections and appointing interim committee.

Previous Decisions

Change Reports for elections of 2017, 2019 and 2022 are pending adjudication; earlier Change Reports for 2010 and 2013 were rejected.

Issues

Whether the Assistant Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 can interfere with an ongoing election process.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that Section 41A is a preventive provision and cannot be used to stall elections once the process has begun. Respondents contended that the election notice was illegal and the Assistant Charity Commissioner had power to pass interim orders to prevent mismanagement.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 is a preventive provision intended for urgent situations to prevent mismanagement, and it does not empower the Assistant Charity Commissioner to interfere with an ongoing election process. Once the election process has commenced, the Assistant Charity Commissioner cannot stay the elections or appoint an interim committee under Section 41A.

Judgment Excerpts

The question, whether in a proceedings under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 the Assistant Charity Commissioner is empowered to interfere with the election process in the middle of the same, is involved in this petition. Section 41A of the Act of 1950 is a preventive provision and the Assistant Charity Commissioner cannot interfere with the election process in the middle of the same.

Procedural History

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed Application No. 160 of 2026 under Section 41A before Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur challenging election notice dated 29/03/2026. The Assistant Charity Commissioner passed an order staying the election process and appointing an interim committee. Petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4116 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench challenging that order. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 10/06/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950: Section 41A, Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Assistant Charity Commissioner's Order Staying Elections Under Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Section 41A Cannot Be Used to Interfere with Mid-Election Process; Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Through...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held tha...