Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Water Draw Permission — Order Passed Pursuant to Interim Directions in Pending Writ Petitions. The court held that since the impugned order was passed in compliance with an interim order in pending writ petitions, there was no infirmity or illegality.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M. Krishnakumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging two letters dated 28.09.2021 issued by the second respondent, the Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., W.R.O., Periyar-Vaigai Basin Division, Madurai. The impugned orders cancelled the permission granted to the petitioner to draw water through a pipeline for non-irrigation lands. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash these orders as arbitrary. The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. Suriyanarayanan, and the respondents, represented by Mr. S. Shanmugavel (Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1-4) and Mr. R. Deenadhayalan (for respondents 5-6). Upon perusal of the materials, the court observed that the impugned order was passed in pursuance of an interim order dated earlier by this court in W.P. Nos. 8957, 8967, and 8973 of 2020, which were still pending. The court found no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the second respondent, as it was merely implementing the interim directions of the court. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as devoid of merits, with no order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Headnote

A) Writ Law - Certiorari - Cancellation of Permission - The petitioner challenged the cancellation of permission to draw water through pipeline for non-irrigation lands. The court held that since the impugned order was passed pursuant to an interim order in pending writ petitions, there was no infirmity or illegality, and the writ petition was dismissed. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order cancelling permission to draw water through pipeline for non-irrigation lands, passed pursuant to an interim order in pending writ petitions, suffers from any infirmity or illegality.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was dismissed as devoid of merits. No order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorari
  • Interim order
  • Pending writ petition
  • No infirmity in order passed pursuant to interim directions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 570

W.P(MD)No.18766 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.15567 and 15568 of 2021

2025-01-02

G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

2025:MHC:96

Mr. R. Suriyanarayanan (for petitioner), Mr. S. Shanmugavel (Addl. Govt Pleader for RR 1 to 4), Mr. R. Deenadhayalan (for RR5 and 6)

M. Krishnakumar

1. The Chief Engineer, P.W.D., W.R.O., Madurai Zone, Madurai-2. 2. The Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., W.R.O., Periyar-Vaigai Basin Division, Madurai-2. 3. The Executive Engineer, P.W.D., W.R.O., Periya-Vaigai Basin Division, Madurai-2. 4. The Assistant Engineer, P.W.D., W.R.O., Irrigation Division, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 5. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, TNEB Complex, NRT Nagar, Theni District. 6. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, TNEB, Chinnamannur, Theni District. 7. Vijayarajan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the cancellation of permission to draw water through pipeline for non-irrigation lands.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the orders dated 28.09.2021 issued by the second respondent cancelling the permission to draw water through pipeline.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's permission to draw water through pipeline for non-irrigation lands was cancelled by the second respondent vide letters dated 28.09.2021.

Previous Decisions

The impugned order was passed pursuant to an interim order in W.P. Nos. 8957, 8967, and 8973 of 2020, which are still pending.

Issues

Whether the order cancelling permission to draw water through pipeline for non-irrigation lands, passed pursuant to an interim order in pending writ petitions, suffers from any infirmity or illegality.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the cancellation order was arbitrary. The respondents contended that the order was passed in compliance with an interim order of this court in pending writ petitions.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed pursuant to an interim direction of a court in pending proceedings does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality, and a challenge to such an order is devoid of merits.

Judgment Excerpts

It is seen that the said order has been passed in pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.8957, 8967 and 8973 of 2020. The main Writ Petition is still pending. In view of the above, there is no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the second respondent. As such, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P(MD)No.18766 of 2021 challenging the cancellation orders dated 28.09.2021. The court heard the matter and dismissed the writ petition on 02.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Appropriate Authority's Purchase Order Under Section 269UD(1) Income Tax Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Supply Valuation Report and Sale Instances to Transferor and Transferee Before Passing Compulsory Purc...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 IPC and Bombay Poli...