Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Conducting 'Madu Avilthal Festival' on Thai Pongal. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ilangovan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District Collector, Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police, and Inspector of Police (respondents 1 to 4) to permit him and his villagers to conduct the 'Madu Avilthal Festival' on the eve of Thai Pongal, i.e., 16.01.2025, and to provide adequate police protection. The petitioner had made a representation to the official respondents on 04.01.2025, but it was not considered. The court observed that when a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty to consider it on its own merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty. Accordingly, the court directed respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2025, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, private respondents (respondents 5 to 8), and all other interested persons, and pass orders in accordance with law within three days from receipt of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any views on the merits of the matter. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Duty of Statutory Authority - Representation - Article 226 of Constitution of India - The court held that whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty to consider it on its own merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation within three days. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for permission to conduct 'Madu Avilthal Festival' and provide police protection.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2025 on its own merits, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, private respondents, and all other interested persons, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three days from receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Duty of statutory authority to consider representation
  • Non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 324

W.P.(MD)No.832 of 2025

2025-01-09

M.S.RAMESH, A.D.MARIA CLETE

For Petitioner: Mr.C.Susikumar, For Respondent No.1: Mr.S.Shaji Bino (Special Government Pleader), For Respondents 2 to 4: Mr.P.Kottaisamy (Government Advocate [Crl. Side])

Ilangovan

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Orathanadu, Thanjavur District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Vattathikottai Police Station, Thanjavur District. 5.A.Raja 6.P.Ramamoorthy 7.C.Periyasamy 8.S.Ramesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to direct authorities to permit conduct of 'Madu Avilthal Festival' and provide police protection.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks direction to respondents 1 to 4 to permit conduct of festival and provide police protection.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2025.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for permission to conduct 'Madu Avilthal Festival' and provide police protection.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted representation dated 04.01.2025 which was not considered. Respondents did not file counter; matter disposed at admission stage.

Ratio Decidendi

Whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying invocation of Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed on 09.01.2025; taken up for final disposal at admission stage by consent of both sides.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Restoring DRO's Cancellation of Patta in Favour of WSIL. Land Acquisition by State Vests Title Absolutely, DRO Cannot Adjudicate Title in Summary Proceedings.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Conducting 'Madu Avilthal Festival' on Thai Pongal. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of In...