Madras High Court Directs Survey and Patta Issuance in Land Dispute — Petitioner's Representation Considered. Court records respondent's statement that survey notice issued for 22.01.2025 and directs survey as per earlier court order.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 128
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Athiyaman, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Tahsildar of Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District, to consider his representation dated 2.12.2024. The representation requested survey of land in S.No.80/1 in Urappanur Bit-I Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District, with an extent of 1 acre and 34 cents, and issuance of a separate patta in his favour for an extent of 10 cents situated in the southern extreme of the western 38 cents of the total extent. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P(MD)No.2241 of 2024 seeking sub-division of the subject lands, but withdrew it with liberty to approach the respondent by way of representation, as he had not made a representation before filing. Thereafter, he submitted a representation on 2.12.2024, but no action was taken, leading to the present petition. The learned Government Advocate (Civil Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that a notice of survey was issued by the respondent on 8.1.2025 fixing the date of survey as 22.01.2025 by the Firka Surveyor, and that survey would be conducted as per the notice. Recording this statement, the court directed the respondent to conduct the survey as per the directions of this Court in W.P(MD)No.243 of 2025, dated 07.01.2025. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Survey and Patta - The petitioner sought a direction to the Tahsildar to survey the land and issue separate patta based on his representation dated 2.12.2024 - The court disposed the petition recording the respondent's statement that survey notice was issued for 22.01.2025 - Held that the respondent shall conduct survey as per earlier court directions (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for survey and issuance of separate patta.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition disposed of recording respondent's statement that survey will be conducted as per notice dated 8.1.2025 and directing respondent to conduct survey as per directions in W.P(MD)No.243 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Survey of land
  • Issuance of patta
  • Representation before filing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 529

W.P(MD)NO.723 OF 2025

2025-01-09

N.MALA

2025:MHC:135

Mr.S.M.Arunkumar, Mr.R.Raghavendran

The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 for Mandamus directing survey and issuance of patta.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 2.12.2024, survey land, and issue separate patta.

Filing Reason

Respondent did not take action on petitioner's representation for survey and patta.

Previous Decisions

Petitioner earlier filed W.P(MD)No.2241 of 2024 which was withdrawn with liberty to approach respondent by representation.

Issues

Whether the respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for survey and issuance of separate patta.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted representation on 2.12.2024 but no action taken. Respondent's counsel submitted that survey notice issued on 8.1.2025 fixing survey on 22.01.2025.

Ratio Decidendi

When a representation is made and the respondent has already taken steps to address it, the court may dispose the petition recording the statement and directing compliance with earlier orders.

Judgment Excerpts

Recording the statement of the learned Government Advocate, the respondents are directed to conduct the survey as per the directions of this Court in W.P(MD)No.243 of 2025, dated 07.01.2025

Procedural History

Petitioner filed W.P(MD)No.2241 of 2024 which was withdrawn with liberty to make representation. Representation made on 2.12.2024. No action led to filing of present W.P(MD)No.723 of 2025. Heard on 09.01.2025 and disposed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State in Assam Land Revenue Premium Fixation for Special Cultivation Tea Garden. Rule 40 Under Assam Land Revenue Regulations Allows State to Fix Premium for Individual Tea Garden as Locality Based on Commercial Value.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be sustained when primary evidence of demand is absent due to complainant's death and no other reliable evidence est...