Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Transfer of Prisoner to Private Hospital as Government Hospital Reports Patient Fit for Discharge. Court directs that if further treatment required, prisoner may be referred to Government Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and Hospital.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Mahalakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider her representation dated 18.01.2025 and shift her husband, Mr. Saravanan @ Bomb Saravanan, a remand prisoner aged 40, from Stanley Government Hospital, Chennai, to Apollo Hospital, Greams Road, Chennai, for proper treatment. The respondents included the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, the Director General of Police & Director General of Prisons and Correctional Service, the Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison-I, Puzhal, and the Dean of Stanley Government Hospital. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted a report from the Professor & HOD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanley Medical College & Hospital, dated 22.01.2025, which indicated that the entry and exit wounds were healing well, a wound swab result was awaited, fasting capillary blood glucose was 120 mg/dl, vital parameters were normal, and the patient was being treated per standard guidelines and planned for discharge. In view of this report, the court found that the relief sought did not require further consideration. However, the court observed that if the doctor opined that further treatment was required, the prisoner could be referred to the Government Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, for speciality treatment. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Health - Medical Treatment of Prisoners - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer her husband, a remand prisoner, from Stanley Government Hospital to Apollo Hospital for treatment. The court relied on the report of the Professor & HOD of Orthopaedic Surgery at Stanley Medical College & Hospital, which stated that the patient's wounds were healing well and he was planned for discharge. The court held that no further consideration was required, but if needed, the prisoner could be referred to Government Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and Hospital. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court should direct shifting of a remand prisoner from a government hospital to a private multi-speciality hospital for treatment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of. No further consideration required in view of the medical report. However, if further treatment is required, the prisoner may be referred to Government Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Chennai. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus
  • medical treatment of prisoners
  • reliance on government hospital report
  • no right to choose private hospital
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 78

W.P.No.1709 of 2025

2025-01-27

S.M. Subramaniam, M. Jothiraman

Mr.P.Pugalenthi (for petitioner), Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor (for respondents)

S. Mahalakshmi

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, The Director General of Police & Director General of Prisons and Correctional Service, The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison-I, Puzhal, The Dean, Stanley Government Hospital

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to shift a remand prisoner from government hospital to private hospital for treatment.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 18.01.2025 and shift her husband from Stanley Government Hospital to Apollo Hospital for proper treatment.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's husband, a remand prisoner, was admitted in Stanley Government Hospital and she sought his transfer to a private multi-speciality hospital for better treatment.

Issues

Whether the court should direct shifting of a remand prisoner from a government hospital to a private multi-speciality hospital for treatment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for shifting her husband to Apollo Hospital for proper treatment. Respondents submitted a medical report from Stanley Government Hospital indicating the patient was healing well and planned for discharge.

Ratio Decidendi

The court relied on the government hospital's medical report indicating the prisoner's condition was stable and he was planned for discharge, and held that no direction to shift to a private hospital was warranted. The court also indicated that if further treatment is needed, it should be at a government hospital.

Judgment Excerpts

The report reveals that entry and exit wounds are healing well. In view of the report of the Professor & HOD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanley Medical College & Hospital, Chennai, the relief as such sought for in the present writ petition deserves no further consideration. However, if the doctor opined that any further treatment is required, the prisoner can be referred to the Government Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Chennai for speciality treatment.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed W.P.No.1709 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus. The court heard the matter and disposed it on 27.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Transfer of Prisoner to Private Hospital as Government Hospital Reports Patient Fit for Discharge. Court directs that if further treatment required, prisoner may be referred to Government Rajiv Gandhi Medic...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Security Guard Reinstatement Case. Termination of Security Guard Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove Continuous Employment for 240 Days Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.