Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Premature Release for 87-Year-Old Blind Convict on Medical Grounds — Keeping Him in Jail Serves No Justice. Court Orders Scrutiny of Application Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Premature Release Based on Medical Condition and Old Age.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, P.Pugalenthi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 12.10.2024 for the premature release of the convict prisoner Mr.Rajamani, aged 87 years, who is totally blind and lodged at Central Prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai. The petitioner contended that due to his advanced age and blindness, the prisoner cannot perform day-to-day activities and depends on others even for food. The authorities had referred him to a Medical Board for premature release, but the report was awaited. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the application would be considered upon receipt of the final medical report and necessary opinions. The Court observed that keeping the prisoner in jail would do no service to justice, as he is suffering unnecessarily and jail authorities may not be able to take care of him. Considering the totality of circumstances, the Court directed the respondents to scrutinize the application and pass appropriate orders on merits within six months from the date of receipt of the order.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Premature Release on Medical Grounds - Petitioner sought direction to consider representation for premature release of an 87-year-old blind convict - Court directed respondents to scrutinize the application and pass orders within six months - Held that keeping such a prisoner in jail serves no justice and causes unnecessary suffering (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner for premature release of an 87-year-old blind convict on medical grounds.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the respondents to scrutinize the application with reference to the medical condition of the prisoner and other aspects and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Law Points

  • Premature release on medical grounds
  • Consideration of representation
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Compassionate grounds for elderly and disabled prisoners
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:MHC:295

W.P.No.31943 of 2024 & W.M.P.No.3633 of 2025

2025-01-30

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, M.JOTHIRAMAN

2025:MHC:295

K.Sakthivel, R.Muniyapparaj

P.Pugalenthi

State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department; The Director General of Police and Director General of Prisons and Correctional Service; The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison-I, Puzhal; The District Collector, Thiruvallur District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to consider representation for premature release of a convict on medical grounds.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider representation dated 12.10.2024 and release the convict prisoner on medical grounds.

Filing Reason

The convict prisoner is 87 years old, totally blind, and unable to perform day-to-day activities; his representation for premature release was pending.

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the representation for premature release of an 87-year-old blind convict on medical grounds.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the prisoner is 87 years old, totally blind, and dependent on others for basic needs; his representation for premature release was pending. Respondents submitted that the application would be considered upon receipt of the final medical report and necessary opinions.

Ratio Decidendi

Keeping an 87-year-old blind convict in jail serves no justice and causes unnecessary suffering; the authorities must consider premature release on medical grounds expeditiously.

Judgment Excerpts

Therefore, keeping him in jail would do no service to the cause of justice. Contrarily, he will be unnecessarily suffering, since the jail authorities may not be in a position to take care of one prisoner inside the prison.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a representation on 12.10.2024 seeking premature release of the convict. The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to consider the representation. The matter was heard on 30.01.2025 and disposed of with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition, Sets Aside Executing Court's Order Condoning Delay in Restoration of Execution Petition. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for Setting Aside E...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Premature Release for 87-Year-Old Blind Convict on Medical Grounds — Keeping Him in Jail Serves No Justice. Court Orders Scrutiny of Application Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Premature...