Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Maharashtra Police Act Externment Case — Externment Order Not Proved. Conviction under Section 142 of Maharashtra Police Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove the externment order and independent witnesses turned hostile.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Sujal Balram Mondal against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was externed from district Gadchiroli and was found in village Jaynagar, Tahsil Chamorshi during the period of externment. He was arrested and chargesheeted for an offence punishable under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi convicted the applicant and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000. On appeal, the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli partly allowed the appeal, maintaining the conviction but reducing the sentence to six months. The applicant then filed the present revision. The High Court heard arguments from both sides. The applicant's counsel argued that the externment order itself was not proved before the trial court, and both panch witnesses had turned hostile, leaving only the evidence of police officers without independent corroboration. The learned APP supported the judgments of the lower courts. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the prosecution had failed to prove the externment order, which is a foundational requirement for the offence under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act. Additionally, the independent witnesses did not support the prosecution, and there was no corroboration to the evidence of the police officers. Consequently, the High Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The revision application was allowed, the judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court were set aside, and the applicant was acquitted of the charge under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Externment - Proof of Externment Order - Section 142 Maharashtra Police Act - The prosecution must prove the externment order as a foundational fact for an offence under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act. In the absence of such proof, the conviction cannot be sustained. (Paras 3-6)

B) Evidence Law - Hostile Witnesses - Corroboration - Section 142 Maharashtra Police Act - When independent panch witnesses turn hostile and do not support the prosecution case, the evidence of police officers alone, without independent corroboration, is insufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act is sustainable when the externment order is not proved and independent witnesses have turned hostile.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision application is allowed. The judgments of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi and the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli are set aside. The applicant is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act. His bail bonds stand cancelled.

Law Points

  • Externment order must be proved
  • Hostile witnesses
  • No independent corroboration
  • Section 142 Maharashtra Police Act
  • Acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 151

Criminal Revision Application No. 178 of 2014

2018-12-06

M.G. Giratkar, J.

Mr. Sumedh Kadam h/f Mr. Rajnish Vyas, Ms. Trupti Udeshi

Sujal Balram Mondal

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision against conviction under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act for violation of externment order.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought acquittal by challenging the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and upheld by the first appellate court.

Filing Reason

The applicant was convicted for being found in a prohibited area during externment, but the externment order was not proved and independent witnesses turned hostile.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi convicted the applicant and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000. The Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2012 partly allowed the appeal, maintaining conviction but reducing sentence to six months.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act is sustainable when the externment order is not proved? Whether the conviction can be based solely on the evidence of police officers when independent witnesses have turned hostile?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant's counsel argued that the externment order was not proved, and both panch witnesses turned hostile, leaving no independent corroboration to the evidence of police officers. The learned APP supported the judgments of the lower courts, arguing that the prosecution had proved its case.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act, the prosecution must prove the externment order as a foundational fact. When independent witnesses turn hostile and there is no independent corroboration to the evidence of police officers, the prosecution fails to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the prosecution against the applicant in short is that, the applicant/accused was externed from district Gadchiroli. He has submitted that the material evidence relied by the prosecution are not proved. Therefore, the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the accused.

Procedural History

The applicant was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi for offence under Section 142 of the Maharashtra Police Act and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and fine. He appealed to the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2012, which partly allowed the appeal, maintaining conviction but reducing sentence to six months. The applicant then filed the present criminal revision before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Police Act: 142
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Maharashtra Police Act Externment Case — Externment Order Not Proved. Conviction under Section 142 of Maharashtra Police Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove the externment order and independent witnesse...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Assistant Professor for Lack of Non-Creamy Layer Certificate at Interview. Court Holds That Production of Certificate After Interview Is a Curable Irregularity, Not a Fatal Defect, and Tha...