Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Public Servant Challenging Disclosure of Salary Slips Under RTI Act — Personal Information Exemption Upheld. Salary slips of a public servant are personal information exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and cannot be disclosed without showing larger public interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Ramchandra Kidile, an Assistant Engineer in the Minor Irrigation Department, Chandrapur, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra State Information Commission, Nagpur Bench, which directed the disclosure of his salary slips for the period from 1st April 2012 to 31st December 2014. The information was sought by respondent No.4, an advocate, who claimed to represent the petitioner's estranged wife in maintenance proceedings. The petitioner argued that salary slips are personal information exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Cen. Information Commr. The respondents contended that salary of a public servant is in the public domain and that the purpose of seeking the information was bona fide for maintenance litigation. The High Court examined the application and found that it was filed by the advocate in his own name, not on behalf of the wife. The Court held that the information sought was personal information of the petitioner and that no larger public interest was shown to justify disclosure. The Court quashed the impugned order of the Information Commission and allowed the petition, ruling that the salary slips are exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act.

Headnote

A) Right to Information - Personal Information Exemption - Section 8(1)(j) of Right to Information Act, 2005 - Salary slips of a public servant - The Court held that salary slips of a public servant for a specific period constitute personal information which is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, unless a larger public interest is shown. The mere fact that the information is sought for a bona fide purpose (maintenance proceedings) does not override the statutory exemption. The Court relied on Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Cen. Information Commr. (AIR 2012 SC (Supp) 690) to hold that personal information cannot be disclosed under the RTI Act. (Paras 4-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether salary slips of a public servant for a specific period constitute 'personal information' exempt from disclosure under the Right to Information Act, 2005, and whether the purpose of seeking such information (for maintenance proceedings) affects the exemption.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order of the Maharashtra State Information Commission, and held that the salary slips of the petitioner are personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Law Points

  • Personal information of a public servant cannot be disclosed under RTI Act unless larger public interest is shown
  • Salary slips of a public servant are personal information exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act
  • 2005
  • The purpose of seeking information does not override statutory exemption
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 162

Writ Petition No.1766 of 2016

2018-10-22

S.B. Shukre, J.

Shri J.R. Kidilay for Petitioner, Shri R.D. Bhuibhar for Respondent No.1, Shri K.D. Deshpande for Respondent No.2 & 3, Shri M.K. Kulkarni for Respondent No.4

Rajesh Ramchandra Kidile

The Maharashtra State Information Commission Bench at Nagpur, The Superintendent Engineer, Chandrapur Irrigation Project Circle, Chandrapur, The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Chandrapur, Adv. R.D. Sontakke

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of State Information Commission directing disclosure of salary slips under RTI Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order of the Maharashtra State Information Commission directing disclosure of his salary slips.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, a public servant, was aggrieved by the order of the Information Commission directing disclosure of his salary slips, which he claimed were personal information exempt under RTI Act.

Previous Decisions

The Maharashtra State Information Commission had directed the disclosure of salary slips of the petitioner for the period 1st April 2012 to 31st December 2014.

Issues

Whether salary slips of a public servant constitute 'personal information' exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Whether the purpose of seeking information (for maintenance proceedings) overrides the exemption under the RTI Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that salary slips are personal information and cannot be disclosed under RTI Act, relying on Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. Cen. Information Commr. Respondents argued that salary of a public servant is in public domain and the information was sought for a bona fide purpose (maintenance proceedings).

Ratio Decidendi

Salary slips of a public servant constitute personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, unless a larger public interest is shown. The purpose of seeking the information does not override the statutory exemption.

Judgment Excerpts

personal information cannot be disclosed under the provisions of the Right to Information Act (22 of 2005) (in short, “RI Act”). the information sought for could not be called as something relating to the personal information of the petitioner

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application under RTI Act seeking salary slips. The Public Information Officer denied disclosure. The first appeal was dismissed. The second appeal before the Maharashtra State Information Commission resulted in an order directing disclosure. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Information Act, 2005: Section 8(1)(j)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Grants Bail to Employee in Cyber Fraud Case Due to Long Incarceration and No Trial Progress. The court held that one year of custody and lack of charge framing constituted a change in circumstances warranting bail under Section 483...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Secondary Evidence of Will Under Section 65 of Evidence Act. Court holds that trial court's discretion to allow secondary evidence when original is lost cannot be interfered with...