Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Appointment Approval Despite Recruitment Ban - Government Resolution Ban Not Applicable to English Teacher Appointments. The court held that the ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 does not apply to appointments for English, Maths, and Science subjects, and directed approval of the petitioner's appointment as a teacher.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 28
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanjay Shankar Gilbile, a teacher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court being aggrieved by the refusal of the Education Officer (Respondent) to grant approval to his appointment. The respondent had refused approval on the ground that there was a ban on recruitment of teachers under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012, and thus the appointment made by the management was illegal. The petitioner was appointed to teach English with effect from 02/09/2013. The court noted that the issue was no longer res integra as a Division Bench of the same court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected petitions had held that the ban would not apply to three categories: (1) where the recruitment process commenced prior to the GR dated 02/05/2012, (2) appointments made for subjects of English, Maths, and Science, and (3) recruitment to fulfill backlog of reserved category candidates. Since the petitioner was appointed to teach English, he fell within the second exception. The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order dated 15/01/2018, and directed the respondents to grant approval to the petitioner's appointment from the date of his appointment i.e. 02/09/2013 as a Shikshan Sevak for three years and thereafter as Assistant Teacher, and to pay him his regular salary from November 2018.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Teacher Appointment Approval - Government Resolution Ban - The issue pertained to refusal of approval to appointment of a teacher on the ground of ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 - The court held that the ban is not applicable to appointments for English, Maths, and Science subjects, as per the earlier Division Bench judgment - Held that the petitioner, appointed to teach English, is squarely covered by the exception and entitled to approval (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the refusal to grant approval to the appointment of a teacher on the ground of a ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 is sustainable when the teacher is appointed to teach English.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 15/01/2018 is quashed and set aside. Respondents are directed to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner from the date of his appointment i.e. 02/09/2013 as a Shikshan Sevak for three years and thereafter as Assistant Teacher and to pay the petitioner his regular salary from the month of November, 2018.

Law Points

  • Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 ban on recruitment not applicable to appointments for English
  • Maths
  • and Science subjects
  • appointments made to fulfill backlog of reserved category candidates
  • and where recruitment process commenced prior to the GR
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 136

Writ Petition No. 1574 of 2018

2018-10-11

B. R. Gavai, M. S. Karnik

Mr Chetan G. Patil (for Petitioner), Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP (for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2)

Sanjay Shankar Gilbile

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal of Education Officer to grant approval to appointment of a teacher.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 15/01/2018 refusing approval and direction to grant approval to his appointment with consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

The Education Officer refused to grant approval to the petitioner's appointment on the ground that there was a ban on recruitment of teachers under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012.

Previous Decisions

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected petitions held that the ban under GR dated 02/05/2012 is not applicable to three categories, including appointments for English, Maths, and Science subjects.

Issues

Whether the refusal to grant approval to the appointment of a teacher on the ground of a ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 is sustainable when the teacher is appointed to teach English.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the ban under GR dated 02/05/2012 is not applicable to appointments for English, Maths, and Science subjects as per the earlier Division Bench judgment. Respondent (AGP) opposed the petition, but the court found the petitioner's case covered by the exception.

Ratio Decidendi

The ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 is not applicable to appointments made for subjects of English, Maths, and Science. Therefore, the refusal to grant approval to a teacher appointed to teach English is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue is no more res integra. The Division Bench of this Court while deciding Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected Writ Petitions vide its judgment dated 10th July, 2017 has observed in para 7 as under: ... Undisputedly, the Petitioner is appointed to teach English with effect from 02/09/2013 and as such, he is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court, cited supra.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1574 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 15/01/2018 passed by the Education Officer refusing to grant approval to his appointment. The court heard the matter on 11/10/2018 and allowed the petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Appointment Approval Despite Recruitment Ban - Government Resolution Ban Not Applicable to English Teacher Appointments. The court held that the ban on recruitment under Government Resolution dated 02/05/2012 does n...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institutions to Conduct Separate CET/CAP in Medical Education Case Under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015. Minority Institutions Granted Interim Permission to Conduct Own Co...