Bombay High Court Quashes Change in Admission Criteria for Medical Seats in Dadra and Nagar Haveli After NEET Commenced. Mid-stream alteration of eligibility rules held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Narendrasinh B. Desai and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 17 July 2018 issued by Respondent No.3, which changed the criteria for admission to medical seats allotted to the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Certain seats from medical colleges of other states available in the Central Government Pool were made available to Respondent No.2 for allotment to candidates who are permanent residents or domiciled in the Union Territory. The petitioners contended that the rules providing criteria for admission were changed after the admission process for the academic year 2018-2019 had commenced, specifically after the NEET examination. The court, while issuing notice on 23 August 2018, observed that the respondents were seeking to change the criteria after students had offered themselves for the qualifying examination. By an ad-interim order, the court directed that the respondents shall not finalize the list of first year MBBS and BDS courses. This order was modified on 5 September 2018 to permit finalization of admissions for students holding permanent residence certificates of the Union Territory, while those without such certificates were not to be finalized. The petitioners alleged that certain candidates were admitted contrary to the interim orders, and leave to amend the petition was granted. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the change of criteria after the commencement of the admission process was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The court quashed the impugned order dated 17 July 2018 and directed the respondents to proceed with admissions in accordance with the rules that existed prior to the change. The court also directed that admissions already made in pursuance of the modified order shall be subject to the final outcome of the petition, but ultimately the petition was allowed and the impugned order was set aside.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Article 14 - Arbitrariness - Mid-stream change of eligibility criteria - The respondents changed the rules providing criteria for admission to medical seats after the NEET examination and the admission process had commenced - Held that such a change is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India (Paras 1-15).

B) Administrative Law - Legitimate Expectation - Change of rules after process commenced - Candidates who had applied based on existing rules had a legitimate expectation that the rules would not be altered to their detriment - Held that the respondents could not change the criteria after the process had begun (Paras 1-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents could change the criteria for admission to medical seats allotted to the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli after the admission process for the academic year 2018-2019 had commenced.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 17 July 2018 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to proceed with the admissions in accordance with the rules that existed prior to the change.

Law Points

  • Mid-stream change of eligibility criteria after commencement of admission process is arbitrary
  • violative of Article 14
  • principles of non-arbitrariness
  • legitimate expectation
  • estoppel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 59

Writ Petition No.9392 of 2018

2018-10-12

B. R. Gavai, M. S. Karnik

Mr. M. M. Vashi, Senior Counsel I/by Mr. Rahul Walia, Advocate for the Petitioners; Mr. R. A. Rodrigues a/w Mr. Dushyant Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 – UOI; Mr. Shreeshailya S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3; Mr. Rajiv Narula I/by Jhangiani Narula & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.4

Narendrasinh B. Desai and others

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging change in admission criteria for medical seats after commencement of admission process.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 17 July 2018 changing admission criteria and direction to proceed with admissions under old rules.

Filing Reason

Respondent No.3 changed the rules providing criteria for admission to medical seats after the admission process for academic year 2018-2019 had commenced.

Previous Decisions

Ad-interim order dated 23 August 2018 directing respondents not to finalize list; modified on 5 September 2018 permitting finalization for candidates with permanent residence certificate.

Issues

Whether the respondents could change the criteria for admission to medical seats after the admission process had commenced.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The change in criteria after the NEET examination and commencement of admission process is arbitrary and illegal. Respondents: The change was necessary and within their power.

Ratio Decidendi

A change in eligibility criteria for admission after the commencement of the admission process is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners have approached this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 17th July 2018, issued by the Respondent No.3, thereby changing the rules provided the criteria for admission to the medical seats allotted to the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli. While issuing notice dated 23rd August 2018, we had observed that the Respondents were seeking to change the criteria for admission after the students had offered themselves for the qualifying examination i.e. after the NEET.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed in 2018; notice issued on 23 August 2018 with ad-interim order; order modified on 5 September 2018; leave to amend granted; final hearing on 12 October 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Change in Admission Criteria for Medical Seats in Dadra and Nagar Haveli After NEET Commenced. Mid-stream alteration of eligibility rules held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal Challenging Mutual Consent Divorce Due to Non-Payment of Alimony. Court Holds That Once Full Payment Is Made During Pendency of Appeal, No Ground Survives to Challenge the Divorce Decree Under Section 13B of...