Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment to Suicide Case Against Applicant Due to Absence of Instigation. Allegations of Sexual Advances Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC Without Evidence of Direct or Indirect Acts of Instigation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ramesh Madhukar Kakad, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No. 42/2017 and the charge-sheet in Regular Criminal Case No. 208/2017 for offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The complainant, Himmat Motiram Pise, brother of the deceased Ramabai Balu Dave, alleged that the applicant used to harass Ramabai for establishing physical relationship and that about 15 days prior to her death, Ramabai had informed the complainant that the applicant came to her house in the wee hours and made sexual advances. A meeting was held where the applicant apologized, and no action was taken. The complainant alleged that Ramabai committed suicide by jumping into a well due to the applicant's instigation. The deceased was suffering from mental illness and was separated from her husband for 20 years. The court examined whether the allegations constituted abetment to suicide. The court held that for an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation, and mere allegations of harassment or sexual advances without a proximate link to the suicide are insufficient. The deceased's mental illness and the fact that the alleged incident occurred 15 days prior, with no evidence of instigation, led the court to conclude that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process. The court quashed the FIR and charge-sheet.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if the allegations do not disclose any offence or are patently absurd. (Paras 1-2)

B) Indian Penal Code - Abetment to Suicide - Section 306 IPC - Ingredients - For conviction under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation, not mere allegations of harassment or sexual advances without proximate link to suicide. (Paras 5-7)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - Where the deceased was suffering from mental illness and the alleged incident of sexual advances occurred 15 days prior, with no evidence of instigation, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offence under Section 306 IPC can be quashed when there is no material to show that the applicant instigated or abetted the deceased to commit suicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR in Crime No. 42/2017 and charge-sheet in Regular Criminal Case No. 208/2017 are quashed.

Law Points

  • Abetment to suicide requires direct or indirect acts of instigation
  • not mere allegations of harassment or sexual advances
  • Section 306 IPC
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (09) 113

Criminal Application (APL) No. 812/2017

2018-09-28

P.N. Deshmukh, Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Mr. A.J. Thakkar for applicant, Ms. H.N. Jaipurkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent no. 1

Ramesh s/o Madhukar Kakad

State of Maharashtra, Himmat s/o Motiram Pise

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR and charge-sheet under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR in Crime No. 42/2017 and charge-sheet in Regular Criminal Case No. 208/2017 for offence under Section 306 IPC

Filing Reason

Allegations that applicant instigated deceased to commit suicide by making sexual advances

Previous Decisions

FIR registered on 12.05.2017, charge-sheet filed on 18.08.2017

Issues

Whether the FIR and charge-sheet for offence under Section 306 IPC can be quashed when there is no material to show that the applicant instigated or abetted the deceased to commit suicide.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that there is no material to show instigation or abetment to suicide, and the deceased was suffering from mental illness. Respondent State argued that the allegations prima facie disclose offence under Section 306 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation. Mere allegations of harassment or sexual advances without a proximate link to the suicide are insufficient. Where the deceased was suffering from mental illness and the alleged incident occurred 15 days prior, with no evidence of instigation, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

Judgment Excerpts

For the purpose of constituting an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be direct or indirect acts of instigation. The deceased was suffering from mental illness and was taking treatment. The alleged incident of sexual advances occurred 15 days prior to the death. There is no material to show that the applicant instigated the deceased to commit suicide.

Procedural History

Complainant lodged report on 30.03.2017 regarding death of Ramabai. Marg No.16/2017 registered. On 12.05.2017, complaint lodged against applicant. FIR registered under Section 306 IPC. Charge-sheet filed on 18.08.2017. Applicant filed Criminal Application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 306
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment to Suicide Case Against Applicant Due to Absence of Instigation. Allegations of Sexual Advances Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC Without Evidence of Direct or Indirect Acts of Instigation.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge in NDPS Case — Possession of Narcotic Drug Sufficient for Prima Facie Case. Court held that at the stage of framing of charge, the court is not required to weigh the evidence metic...