Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Head Master in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Caste-Based Abuse and Attempt to Murder Found Baseless as Complainant's Own Statement Implicated Only Unknown Persons, Not the Applicant.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 41
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Vijay Sahadeorao Waghmare, a Head Master at Golden Kids High School, Amravati, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 165/2013 registered at Gadge Nagar Police Station, Amravati, for offences under Sections 307, 363, 294, 504, 506(B), 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1955. The incident allegedly occurred on 6 May 2013 when respondent no. 2/complainant, Prakash Chaitramji Kharule, visited the school to inquire about his son's admission. According to the complainant, two young boys caught hold of him, assaulted him, and abused him on caste basis. The complainant lodged a report against the applicant and two unknown persons. The applicant contended that the complainant, being an active member of the parents-teachers' association, had a grudge against him and falsely implicated him. The court noted that the complainant's own statement did not implicate the applicant in any overt act; the allegations were only against two unknown persons. The chargesheet was filed only against co-accused nos. 2 and 3, and no chargesheet was filed against the applicant due to an interim stay. The court held that continuing proceedings against the applicant would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the FIR and all proceedings against the applicant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - FIR can be quashed if no prima facie case is made out and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law - Held that where the complainant's own version does not implicate the applicant and the chargesheet is filed only against co-accused, the FIR against the applicant is liable to be quashed (Paras 7-8).

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x) - Prima Facie Case - Allegations of caste-based abuse must be specific and directly implicate the accused - Held that in the absence of any allegation that the applicant himself uttered caste-based words or participated in the assault, the offence under Section 3(1)(x) is not made out (Para 7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings against the applicant should be quashed when the complainant's own statement does not implicate the applicant and the chargesheet has been filed only against co-accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR No. 165/2013 registered with Police Station, Gadge Nagar, Amravati and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed and set aside against the applicant.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Lack of prima facie case
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 178

Criminal Application (APL) No. 350 of 2013

2018-07-23

P.N. Deshmukh, M.G. Giratkar

V.B. Bhise for applicant, S.J. Kadu for respondent no.1

Vijay Sahadeorao Waghmare

The State of Maharashtra, Prakash Chaitramji Kharule

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 165/2013 and all proceedings arising therefrom

Filing Reason

Applicant alleged false implication due to grudge by complainant, and that FIR did not disclose any offence against him

Previous Decisions

Interim order dated 13/8/2013 staying proceedings in the crime; chargesheet filed only against co-accused nos. 2 and 3

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings against the applicant should be quashed when the complainant's own statement does not implicate the applicant and the chargesheet has been filed only against co-accused.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that no case is made out against applicant from contents of report; complainant had grudge and falsely implicated him; chargesheet filed only against co-accused. Respondent no.2 submitted written submissions contending that two unknown persons caught hold of him and assaulted him, but did not specifically implicate applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the complainant's own version does not implicate the applicant and the chargesheet is filed only against co-accused, continuing proceedings against the applicant would be an abuse of the process of law, and the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

From the contents of the report, no case is made out against the applicant and the complainant's own statement does not implicate the applicant in any overt act. Continuation of proceedings against the applicant would be nothing but an abuse of process of law.

Procedural History

FIR No. 165/2013 registered on 6/5/2013. Applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No. 350/2013 for quashing. On 12/6/2013, court directed no coercive action. On 13/8/2013, proceedings stayed. On 16/7/2018, counsel stated chargesheet filed only against co-accused. Judgment delivered on 23/7/2018 quashing FIR against applicant.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 363, 294, 504, 506(B), 323, 34
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(x)
  • Indian Arms Act, 1955: 3, 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Unaided Private School to Fix Fees Subject to Reasonable Regulation. Fee Fixation Must Be Transparent and Not Excessive Under Grant in Aid Code and Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 198...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.