Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Proximate Link Between Alleged Harassment and Suicide. Suicide Note Dated Over a Month Before Death and Deceased's Pre-existing Mental Distress Negate Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 50
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Pramod Shriram Telgote, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 51/2013 registered at Police Station Borgaon Manju, District Akola, for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged by the non-applicant No.2, Triveni Rupchand Sirsat, wife of the deceased Rupchand Sirsat. The deceased, aged about 54 years, was working as a Group Secretary in Kherda-Mozari Cooperative Society and committed suicide on 04.04.2013 by consuming poisonous substance. He left a suicide note dated 21.02.2013 alleging harassment by the applicant and several others including MPs and MLAs. The applicant contended that he was not concerned with abetting the suicide and sought quashing of the FIR. The court examined the suicide note and the leave applications submitted by the deceased on 27.02.2013 and 01.04.2013, which indicated that his physical and mental condition was not good. The suicide note also mentioned that the deceased's son had committed suicide, which had caused him mental distress. The court observed that the suicide note was written over a month before the actual suicide, and there was no proximate link between the alleged harassment by the applicant and the suicide. The court held that the ingredients of abetment under Section 306 IPC were not made out, as there was no instigation or active abetment by the applicant. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Quashing of FIR - The court considered whether the allegations in the FIR and suicide note constituted abetment of suicide. The suicide note was dated 21.02.2013, while the suicide occurred on 04.04.2013. The deceased had applied for leave on 27.02.2013 and 01.04.2013 citing poor physical and mental condition. The court held that there was no proximate link between the alleged harassment by the applicant and the suicide, as the note was written over a month prior and the deceased was already mentally disturbed due to his son's suicide. The FIR was quashed. (Paras 5-7)

B) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Inherent Powers - Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The court exercised its inherent powers to quash the FIR when the allegations did not make out a prima facie case of abetment of suicide. The court found that the suicide note did not indicate any instigation or active abetment by the applicant, and the deceased's mental state was due to personal tragedy. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings for abetment of suicide under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC can be quashed when the suicide note was written over a month before the actual suicide and the deceased was already mentally disturbed due to his son's suicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed Crime No. 51/2013 registered at Police Station Borgaon Manju, District Akola, for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires direct or indirect act of instigation
  • Section 306 IPC
  • Mens rea
  • Proximate link between alleged harassment and suicide
  • Suicide note dated prior to death
  • Pre-existing mental distress
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 176

Criminal Application (APL) No. 293 of 2013

2018-07-04

P.N. Deshmukh, M.G. Giratkar

Shri Ayush Sharma for applicant, Smt. M.H. Deshmukh for non-applicant No.1/State

Pramod Shriram Telgote

State of Maharashtra, Triveni Rupchand Sirsat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 51/2013 registered for offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC

Filing Reason

Applicant alleged that he was falsely implicated in abetment of suicide case based on a suicide note written over a month before the suicide, and the deceased was already mentally disturbed due to his son's suicide.

Issues

Whether the FIR and proceedings for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC can be quashed when the suicide note was written over a month before the suicide and the deceased was already mentally disturbed. Whether the allegations in the FIR and suicide note make out a prima facie case of abetment of suicide against the applicant.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that he was nowhere concerned with abetting the deceased for commission of suicide and sought quashing of the FIR. State/Non-applicant No.1 opposed the application, but no specific arguments are recorded in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be a direct or indirect act of instigation or abetment that has a proximate link to the suicide. In this case, the suicide note was written over a month before the suicide, and the deceased was already mentally disturbed due to his son's suicide, as evidenced by leave applications. Therefore, the ingredients of abetment were not made out, and the FIR was liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

From the perusal of suicide note, it appears that it was addressed to Police Station Officer, Barshitakli. It is dated 21.02.2013. Thereafter, deceased applied for leave on 27.02.2013 and 01.04.2013, and on 04.04.2013, he has committed suicide. From the perusal of suicide note, it appears that applicant and others mentally harassed her husband and, therefore, he has committed suicide on 04.04.2013. It appears from the leave applications, dated 27.02.2013 and 01.04.2013, his physical and mental condition was not good. He has written in his suicide note that his son had committed suicide. Therefore, he was mentally disturbed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No. 293 of 2013 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No. 51/2013 registered at Police Station Borgaon Manju, District Akola, for offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 04.07.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 306, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Tenant in Bombay Tenancy Act Restoration Case Due to Landlord's Failure to Cultivate Personally for Extended Period. Section 52 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act, 1958 Applies to Pre-C...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Unlicensed Driver. Driver lacked valid transport licence; insurer liable to pay compensation but entitled to recover from owner and driver under 'pay and recover' pri...