Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination Form of Scheduled Tribe Candidate Who Converted to Islam. Conversion Does Not Automatically Result in Loss of Scheduled Tribe Status for Election Purposes.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Manoj Parmeshwar Sidam, a member of Kurkheda Nagar Panchayat and belonging to Scheduled Tribe, challenged the decision of the Election Officer accepting the nomination form of respondent No.3, Smt. Shaheda Tabassum Tayar Mugal, for the post of President of Kurkheda Nagar Panchayat, which was reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidate. The petitioner contended that respondent No.3 originally belonged to Gond Scheduled Tribe but converted to Islam after marriage and thus ceased to belong to the Scheduled Tribe. The respondent No.3 raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition was not maintainable in view of Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution of India, which bars any court except the election tribunal from entertaining challenges to election matters. The Court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable. The Court also observed that even on merits, the respondent No.3 continues to belong to Gond Scheduled Tribe despite conversion, as Scheduled Tribe status is determined by birth and not by religion. The Court held that the petition was liable to be dismissed on the ground of maintainability.

Headnote

A) Constitution of India - Article 243ZG(b) - Bar on interference by courts in election matters - The Court held that the challenge to acceptance of nomination form cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction as Article 243ZG(b) bars any court except the election tribunal from entertaining disputes relating to elections to Nagar Panchayats. (Para 7-8)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Conversion - Loss of Scheduled Tribe status - The Court held that conversion to Islam does not automatically result in loss of Scheduled Tribe status as the caste is determined by birth and not by religion. The respondent No.3 continues to belong to Gond Scheduled Tribe despite conversion. (Para 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a person who originally belonged to a Scheduled Tribe but converted to Islam is entitled to contest election as a Scheduled Tribe candidate for a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable in view of Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution of India. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Scheduled Tribe status is determined by birth and not by religion
  • conversion does not automatically result in loss of Scheduled Tribe status
  • Article 243ZG(b) bars challenge to election matters except by election petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 153

WRIT PETITION NO. 2950 OF 2018

2018-06-27

B.P.Dharmadhikari, Z.A.Haq

Ms A.K. Shah, Shri N.R.Patil, Shri V.N.Morande, Shri M.P.Khajanchi

Manoj Parmeshwar Sidam

State of Maharashtra, SubDivision Officer and Election Officer, Smt. Shaheda Tabassum Tayar Mugal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging acceptance of nomination form for election to post of President of Nagar Panchayat.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of decision of Election Officer accepting nomination form of respondent No.3.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed respondent No.3 ceased to belong to Scheduled Tribe after converting to Islam and was ineligible to contest as Scheduled Tribe candidate.

Issues

Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution of India. Whether respondent No.3 is entitled to contest election as Scheduled Tribe candidate despite conversion to Islam.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent No.3 converted to Islam and thus ceased to belong to Gond Scheduled Tribe. Respondent No.3 raised preliminary objection that writ petition is barred by Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution of India bars any court from entertaining any challenge to election matters except by way of an election petition before the appropriate tribunal. Therefore, the writ petition challenging acceptance of nomination form is not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The advocate for the respondent No.3 has raised preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that Article 243ZG(b) of the Constitution of India bars any Court, except the Court/ Tribunal having jurisdiction to entertain and decide the election petition, from entertaining any challenge to the election matters.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date. Rule was issued on 14.06.2018 and the petition was taken up for final hearing. Judgment was pronounced on 27.06.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 243ZG(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Levy of House Tax on Municipal Buildings Leased to Occupiers. The Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 Empowers Municipalities to Impose House Tax on Their Own Buildings, with Primary Liability on the Actual Occupier Holding a Le...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Criminal Cases Outside State of Punjab Due to Reasonable Apprehension of Bias. Transfer Petition under Section 527 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 allowed because unrebutted affidavit showed petitioner reasonably ...